2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of maternal characteristics on the effect of maternal influenza vaccination on fetal outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9]11,12 All the five studies reported aOR < 1, although in only one study did the 95% CI not cross the unit. The inclusion of the Table 1 Characteristics and reported adjusted odds ratio of the studies that assessed the effect of seasonal influenza vaccine given during pregnancy and birth outcomes included in the primary meta-analyses Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; aRR, adjusted risk ratio; BW: birth weight; GA, gestational age; LBW, low birth weight; N/A, not assessed; PTB, preterm birth; SGA, small for gestational age.…”
Section: Preterm Birthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9]11,12 All the five studies reported aOR < 1, although in only one study did the 95% CI not cross the unit. The inclusion of the Table 1 Characteristics and reported adjusted odds ratio of the studies that assessed the effect of seasonal influenza vaccine given during pregnancy and birth outcomes included in the primary meta-analyses Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; aRR, adjusted risk ratio; BW: birth weight; GA, gestational age; LBW, low birth weight; N/A, not assessed; PTB, preterm birth; SGA, small for gestational age.…”
Section: Preterm Birthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest estimates of protection of maternal vaccination against preterm deliveries were calculated during the widespread influenza activity period in the USA. 30,33,49 Nonetheless, the 40% to 70% reduction in risk of preterm deliveries during the period of viral circulation in these observational studies appears very large, taking in consideration that the efficacy of maternal vaccination is probably only 50% and that influenza infection is not associated with preterm birth rates to that level of magnitude. The A/H1N1pdm09 studies were conducted late in the pandemic season hence exposure to the virus was probably marginal, consequently, any positive effect of maternal vaccination on birth outcomes would be nonspecific and probably not attributable to the prevention of infection.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Observational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To adjust for group differences and reduce confounding bias in observational studies 2 main approaches were used: propensity scores 31,34,37 and multiple logistic regression analysis. 10,21,27,29,30,33,35,36,39,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] In propensity score analyses probability of vaccination is estimated as a function of available variables and then that score is used as a single matching covariate. The propensity score matching allows comparing the risks after vaccination between cohorts that had the same likelihood of being vaccinated.…”
Section: 27-49mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations