For interfaces between micro-porous layers (MPL) and catalyst layers (CL) made by the gas diffusion electrode (GDE) method, a seamless interface without gaps, shows better performance than that of cells with an interface made by the decal transfer method. With the decal transfer method, the MPL is simply hot-pressed to the CL-membrane assembly. This study investigates the effect of interface structure on cell performance and water transport in the MPL. Water distribution in cross sections of multiple layers were observed by a freezing method, where the cell is cooled below freezing temperature in short time and the water was observed in ice form by Cryo-SEM. The results show that a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) using the GDE method improves cell performance at high current densities. Direct observations by the freezing method and cryo-SEM show that there is no water accumulation at the MPL/CL interface made by the GDE method, while water accumulates at the interface made by the decal method. Other observations show that the water amount inside the MPL increases similarly in the two types of MEA when lowering the temperature, and the difference between the two types of MEA was only the water amount in the interface. Polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) are promising power sources for next generation vehicles, motorcycles, and residential cogeneration systems (the so-called combined heat and power; CHP). However, there is considerable potential for improvements in the performance for the PEFC to become practical in many other applications. Water flooding, the blockage of the gas supply to the reaction area by accumulation of water, is one of the major issues with the PEFC, as cell performance deteriorates significantly under high current density conditions. Micro-porous layers (MPLs), typically consisting of carbon black and a hydrophobic polymer, have been demonstrated to be an important component in improving the water management of the PEFC.The effect of a hydrophobic MPL on the water transport mechanism in the cell has been investigated by computational and experimental studies, and these studies have suggested that the MPL removes produced water from the reaction area.1-5 Weber et al. and Pasaogullari et al. reported that the MPL reduces the amount of water passing through the cathode side of the gas diffusion layer (GDL) by increasing the water flow from cathode to anode.1,2 Gostick et al. and Lu et al. suggested that cracks in the MPL are the pathways of the water discharge, and that this results in reductions in the water saturation in the GDL.3,4 Owejan et al. investigated water transport in the MPL by measuring the performance of cells with various types of MPL, and proposed that the MPL prevents the water in the GDL from contacting with and forming a water film on the catalyst layer (CL) surface.5 They also investigated the water vapor transport capacity through the MPL driven by the saturation pressure gradient in the cathode diffusion layer due to the temperature gradient, and demonstrated that ...