2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of microsatellite instability (MSI) on survival in high grade endometrial carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2,32,33 Microsatellite instability is caused by an inability of the MMR system to cut out and replace the mismatching DNA strains due to methylation or mutation of its proteins (MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6). 34 Two previous studies showed that microsatellite instability was present in 5% 35 and 23.3% 21 of uterine carcinosarcomas. The latter study observed that microsatellite instability is mainly a feature of the epithelial component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2,32,33 Microsatellite instability is caused by an inability of the MMR system to cut out and replace the mismatching DNA strains due to methylation or mutation of its proteins (MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6). 34 Two previous studies showed that microsatellite instability was present in 5% 35 and 23.3% 21 of uterine carcinosarcomas. The latter study observed that microsatellite instability is mainly a feature of the epithelial component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some studies reported that microsatellite instability is associated with a favorable prognosis, 31,32 whereas in other studies a significant worse prognosis was found. 33,34 Possible explanations for these discrepancies include cohort differences, lack of statistical power, and diversity of methodology. Further studies will be required to clarify the effects of POLE mutations and microsatellite instability on the biological behavior of endometrial tumor cells and the associated mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear staining for ER, PR, p53, and MLH1 was considered positive when the extent of immunostaining was more than 10%, regardless of the intensity [20][21][22]. Immunostaining of Her2 was observed in the cell membrane, and scores of 0 or 1+ indicated negative results, whereas scores of 2+ and 3+ were regarded as positive results.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%