2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-020-00332-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of missing attributes on the novelty metric of Shah et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, Nelson et al (2009) and Johnson et al (2016) propose refinements to the variety and novelty metrics, respectively. Furthermore, Fiorineschi et al (2020a) demonstrate that missing attributes in the definitions of designs (e.g. certain designs not addressing certain functions) could lead to variations in the scores when implementing Shah et al's novelty metrics.…”
Section: Design Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Nelson et al (2009) and Johnson et al (2016) propose refinements to the variety and novelty metrics, respectively. Furthermore, Fiorineschi et al (2020a) demonstrate that missing attributes in the definitions of designs (e.g. certain designs not addressing certain functions) could lead to variations in the scores when implementing Shah et al's novelty metrics.…”
Section: Design Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of experiment could be prohibitive and too much onerous to be performed. However, a hint to overcome the problem can be found in the recent work of Fiorineschi, Frillici, and Rotini (2020a) , where a very high number of 'virtual sets of ideas' has been exploited to evaluate the differences between M SNM and M SNM . The same experiment can be repeated by considering M SNM in place of M SNM .…”
Section: Limits and Research Hintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, it is possible to investigate if and to what extent the proposed SO approach can stimulate designers to generate ideas 'new in relation to their personal knowledge', i.e., the so-called 'psychological creativity' [29]. In this case, the a posteriori novelty metric of Shah can be used by considering the recent observations and improvements [30][31][32].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%