Impact of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash on the properties and frost resistance of clay bricks

Kizinievič, Olga; Voišnienė, Violeta; Kizinievič, Viktor; Pundienė, Ina

doi:10.1007/s10163-021-01314-4

Cited by 14 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using waste ash instead of soil is seen as a viable and ecological option for preserving natural resources and reducing ash toxicity and landfill problems. Researchers have incorporated various ashes in fired and unfired bricks as a replacement for clay such as fly ash [43][44][45], bottom ash [46,47], round blast furnace slag [48], and incineration ash [49,50]. Compared to other industrial ashes, lignocellulosic biomass combustion ash has not been thoroughly investigated in the production of bricks.…”

Section: Possibilities To Improve the Brick's Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bricks Using Clay Mixed with Powder and Ashes from Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The production of fired or stabilized bricks from lignocellulosic biomass ash is thoroughly examined in this article. Bricks are typically made through the high-temperature firing process or by stabilizing the mixture with binders such as lime and cement. These bricks have a large carbon footprint and high levels of grey energy. In many parts of the world, the excessive use of clay as a natural raw material for the production of conventional bricks will lead to its scarcity. The mixing of clay with lignocellulosic ash during brick manufacturing leads to a better and more reliable solution that conserves scarce natural resources and reduces the impact of environmental pollution. This study aims to review the state of the art in the production of bricks based on lignocellulosic ashes and their physical, thermal, and mechanical properties. The most recent data in the literature related to the manufacture of lignocellulosic ash-based bricks either by firing, cementing or geopolymerization, the design of mixtures, as well as the identification of the main factors influencing the performance and durability of these bricks are presented and discussed. Despite extensive research, there is still very little commercial use of waste bricks in general and lignocellulosic biomass ash in particular. Various toxicity issues of lignocellulosic ash used in brick production limit their use on an industrial scale due to a lack of appropriate standards. In order to achieve practical production of bricks from lignocellulosic ash, research is still needed on standardizing and sustaining biomass ash recycling.

show abstract

Section: Possibilities To Improve the Brick's Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bricks Using Clay Mixed with Powder and Ashes from Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, waste processing and then utilisation as secondary material is still the best solution (Phua et al 2019). At present, the processed bottom ash is mainly utilised in Europe as construction material (Cho et al 2020, Vateva and Laner 2020, Kizinievič et al 2022). This residue is more often utilised as the raw material in comparison with fly ash; therefore, its influence on the environment must be considered (Wu et al 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fractional Composition of Nickel, Manganese and Iron in Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash

Łukowski¹

2022

J. Ecol. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fractions of Ni, Mn and Fe in the municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash were investigated. Three fractions of studied metals were separated according to the BCR procedure (acid soluble and exchangeable, reducible and oxidizable). Pseudo-total metal content, pH and dry mass in all samples were evaluated. The share of nickel in fractions followed the sequence: F4 (79.0%) > F3 (9.0%) > F1 (7.5%) > F2 (4.5%), for manganese: F4 (60.4%) > F1 (16.8%) > F2 (13.2%) > F3 (9.6%) and for iron: F4 (74.4%) > F2 (12.6%) > F3 (12.5%) > F1 (0.5%). Mobile pool of metals (F1-F3) contained the least of nickel (21.0%) and the most of manganese (39.7%).

show abstract

Performance Analysis and Optimization of Low Temperature Dual Pressure Waste Heat Power Generation (WHPG) System

Liu¹

2023

Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Impact of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash on the properties and frost resistance of clay bricks

Cited by 14 publications

References 39 publications

Bricks Using Clay Mixed with Powder and Ashes from Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review

Bricks Using Clay Mixed with Powder and Ashes from Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review

Fractional Composition of Nickel, Manganese and Iron in Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash

Performance Analysis and Optimization of Low Temperature Dual Pressure Waste Heat Power Generation (WHPG) System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About