“…Experimental studies have demonstrated the effect of size on the mechanical and thermodynamic properties of nano-objects, as seen with the elastic moduli of hollow fibers 9 and electrospun nanofibers, [10][11][12][13][14] which sharply increase below a certain fiber diameter, as well as shifts in object melting temperatures. 15,16 Similarly, thickness and surface interactions of ultrathin polymer films (the film thickness is in the order of 2R g of a polymer chain, or less) highly influence their glass transition and melting temperatures, [17][18][19] polymer dynamics in the glassy state, 20 crystallization kinetics and degree of crystallinity, [21][22][23] phase behavior, 24 and morphology. 25,26 For all the above examples, the portion of ''surface material'' is comparable with the bulk, due to extremely small object size, therefore, the ansatz claiming ''nano-object ¼ bulk þ surface'' seems relevant for such systems from a physical point of view.…”