2007
DOI: 10.1094/cm-2007-0219-01-rs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Nitrogen Applications to Wheat on No-tillage Double-crop Soybean

Abstract: Due to the popularity of double‐crop production systems in the southern United States, particularly soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] following wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), wheat‐residue management practices are critical to the successful establishment of double‐cropped soybean. The objective of this study was to ascertain the effects of N application to wheat on no‐tillage soybean growth and production in a double‐crop system. This study was conducted over two cropping seasons at two locations on silt‐loam … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low-residue treatments did not receive any N fertilizer to ensure a residuelevel difference was achieved. Brye et al (2007) demonstrated that, at greater N fertilization rates and in the same plots as used in this study, neither nitrate-N, ammonium-N, nor total inorganic N (i.e., nitrate-plus ammonium-N) differed among residue levels in 2002 or 2003 when sampled following wheat, but prior to soybean. Thus, it was reasonably assumed that, at the lower N fertilization rates used in this study, there was no difference in carryover N from the wheat to affect early season soybean or weed growth and establishment differentially.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Low-residue treatments did not receive any N fertilizer to ensure a residuelevel difference was achieved. Brye et al (2007) demonstrated that, at greater N fertilization rates and in the same plots as used in this study, neither nitrate-N, ammonium-N, nor total inorganic N (i.e., nitrate-plus ammonium-N) differed among residue levels in 2002 or 2003 when sampled following wheat, but prior to soybean. Thus, it was reasonably assumed that, at the lower N fertilization rates used in this study, there was no difference in carryover N from the wheat to affect early season soybean or weed growth and establishment differentially.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Although yields cannot typically reach those of full‐season soybeans, early emergence and early‐season growth are critical to optimize productivity. The lack of response of soybean plant height early in the season to residue management has been more predominantly seen in the literature (Brye et al., 2007a, 2007b; Chastain et al., 1995). Although Cordell et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most producers have adopted no‐till, burning of the wheat residue prior to planting is a common practice in the Mid‐South because planting into standing stubble can decrease early‐season stands, delay early growth, and decrease soybean yields. However, studies evaluating the effects of residue management in double‐crop soybeans have often found mixed results regarding early‐season growth and yield (Beale & Langdale, 1967; Brye, Cordell, Longer, & Gbur, 2007b; Brye et al., 2007a;Chastain, Ward, & Wysocki, 1995; Cordell, Brye, Longer, & Gbur, 2007; Hairston, Stanford, Pope, & Horneck, 1987; NeSmith, Hargrove, Radcliffe, Tollner, & Arioglu, 1987; Sanford, 1982). Cordell et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%