2011
DOI: 10.1684/agr.2011.0492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of no-tillage agricultural methods on the energy balance and the greenhouse gas balance of cropping systems

Abstract: Impact des techniques culturales sans labour (TCSL) sur le bilan énergétique et le bilan des gaz à effet de serre des systèmes de culture Résumé Après une synthèse de mesures sur les réductions de consommation de carburant par la mise en place des techniques de culture sans labour (TCSL), un bilan énergétique et un bilan d'émission de gaz à effet de serre (GES) ont été réalisés à partir de l'essai de longue durée de Boigneville (Bassin parisien). Dans cet essai, la réduction de la consommation annuelle de carb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2011) associated the lower biomass observed under direct seeding with less soil porosity, which affects the development of the crop root system. Less below-ground biomass under direct seeding has been also associated with difficulty in rooting due to compact soils under no tillage (Labreuche et al, 2011). In our study, however, the average differences in root biomass in favor of tillage are largely driven by the results of the BMF and BMF+A treatments in both Soaodou and Savalou; when averages are calculated per single treatment (soil preparation × fertilization regime), we observed no significant differences in root biomass between any of the soil preparation and fertilization regimes (Table 4).…”
Section: Above-and Below-ground Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2011) associated the lower biomass observed under direct seeding with less soil porosity, which affects the development of the crop root system. Less below-ground biomass under direct seeding has been also associated with difficulty in rooting due to compact soils under no tillage (Labreuche et al, 2011). In our study, however, the average differences in root biomass in favor of tillage are largely driven by the results of the BMF and BMF+A treatments in both Soaodou and Savalou; when averages are calculated per single treatment (soil preparation × fertilization regime), we observed no significant differences in root biomass between any of the soil preparation and fertilization regimes (Table 4).…”
Section: Above-and Below-ground Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques of restoring soil quality include conservation agriculture, integrated nutrient management, and continuous vegetative cover such as residue mulch and cover cropping, and controlled grazing at appropriate stocking rates. The strategy is to produce "more from less" by reducing losses and increasing soil, water, and nutrient use efficiency (Labreuche, Lellahi, Malaval, & Germon, 2011;Lal, 2015). Sustainable intensification, producing more from less by reducing losses and increasing the use efficiency, is attainable through improvement of soil quality including chemical quality or soil fertility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L'augmentation générale de la surface des exploitations et la faible diversité des assolements impliquent des pointes de travail que l'agriculteur tente de réduire en minimisant les temps d'intervention, ce que peuvent permettre les TCSL. Mais le développement de ce type de pratiques est aussi fortement lié à des préoccupations environnementales concernant le fonctionnement biologique (Mikanova et al, 2009) et la protection du sol : réduction de l'érosion éolienne et hydrique (Labreuche et al, 2007), restauration de la porosité des sols (Maillard et al, 1995 ;Roger-Estrade et al, 2011), stockage accru du carbone dans les horizons de surface (Maillard et al, 1994) et réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre (Labreuche et al, 2011). Ainsi, c'est un ensemble de préoccupations environnementales et économiques qui amène les agriculteurs à réduire la profondeur de travail du sol et à délaisser de façon plus ou moins totale l'utilisation de la charrue.…”
unclassified