Impact of Non‐Pharmacological Cognitive Interventions on Real‐World Daily Function in Children With Cancer: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) frequently experience cognitive challenges, which impact their ability to participate in functional activities. This systematic review examines the effects of nonpharmacological cognitive interventions on functional outcomes (e.g., activities of daily living). We systematically searched eight databases (e.g., PubMed, EMBASE) from 2012 to 2023. Two team members independently screened articles and extracted article, intervention, sample characteristics, and outcome data. We assessed intervention reporting with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, representing 12 unique trials. Four of the six trials evaluating Cogmed, a computerized working memory training program, demonstrated functional benefits; small to large effects were observed for academic achievement (Cohen's d = 0.28–0.87) and decreased inattention in daily life (d = −0.36 and −0.98). Other interventions included exergaming, math or reading interventions, occupational therapy, and neurofeedback. Less than half of studies reported on intervention personalization (n = 5), fidelity assessment (n = 4), or cost (n = 1). Study heterogeneity limited our ability to meta‐analyze results for functional outcomes. Limited evidence and gaps in quality of intervention reporting are barriers to addressing the cognitive challenges of CCS. Standardizing functional outcome measurement, identifying effective interventions, and improving the quality of intervention reporting could accelerate the translation of intervention research to clinical practice.