2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Novel Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics on Blood Bank Pretransfusion Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…29 Antiidiotype antibody and soluble recombinant CD38 are also reported to prevent binding of daratumumab with CD38-expressing reagent RBCs; 9 however, although the cost of reagent is minimal, this method is expensive and, like DTT, encumbered by an absence of resources not routinely available at many hospital blood banks. 9,16,30,31 In conclusion, the current study shows that both isatuximab and daratumumab interfere with IATs but at different magnitudes in vitro and in vivo, reflecting distinct binding to CD38. In in vitro binding studies, CD38 expressed by RBCs can be directly recognized by daratumumab, whereas isatuximab requires a co-factor, such as a mouse anti-CD38 antibody (HB-7 or AT13/5) or a CD38 inhibitor, suggesting that the isatuximab epitope on RBCs is masked.…”
Section: Isatuximab Interference In the Clinical Settingmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29 Antiidiotype antibody and soluble recombinant CD38 are also reported to prevent binding of daratumumab with CD38-expressing reagent RBCs; 9 however, although the cost of reagent is minimal, this method is expensive and, like DTT, encumbered by an absence of resources not routinely available at many hospital blood banks. 9,16,30,31 In conclusion, the current study shows that both isatuximab and daratumumab interfere with IATs but at different magnitudes in vitro and in vivo, reflecting distinct binding to CD38. In in vitro binding studies, CD38 expressed by RBCs can be directly recognized by daratumumab, whereas isatuximab requires a co-factor, such as a mouse anti-CD38 antibody (HB-7 or AT13/5) or a CD38 inhibitor, suggesting that the isatuximab epitope on RBCs is masked.…”
Section: Isatuximab Interference In the Clinical Settingmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Other methods of avoiding anti‐CD38 interference include the use of trypsin, a proteolytic enzyme that decreases daratumumab binding to CD38‐expressing cells, but it is not as extensively used as DTT 29 . Anti‐idiotype antibody and soluble recombinant CD38 are also reported to prevent binding of daratumumab with CD38‐expressing reagent RBCs; 9 however, although the cost of reagent is minimal, this method is expensive and, like DTT, encumbered by an absence of resources not routinely available at many hospital blood banks 9,16,30,31 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, 98 cases of MM, 22 cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 16 cases of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia as shown in Table 1. CD38 monoclonal antibody is daratumab [14][15][16][17][18] . In addition to daratumab (Janssen Biotech), other anti-CD38 drugs currently in Phase 1 or 2 clinical trials include MOR202 (MorPhoSys), isatuximab (Sanofi-Aventis) and TAK-079 (Takeda), which were adopted for systemic lupus erythematosus or other autoimmune diseases treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD47 is a ubiquitously expressed surface glycoprotein and anti-phagocytic marker which regulates cell survival and is overexpressed in a broad range of tumors. 2 Administration of CD47 antibodies can be associated with the decline in hemoglobin levels and broad interference in pre-transfusion testing, 3 similar to daratumumab. However, anti-CD47 agents differ from daratumumab in that pan-reactivity cannot be selectively removed through commonly available in vitro manipulation, such as the use of DTT-treated reagent RBCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%