Impact of nutritional risk factors on the development of multiple sclerosis

Abstract

The literature review considers the data on the assessment of the influence of alimentary factors on the development of a severe neurological disease - multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a polyetiologic disease, the risk of development of which is influenced by both infectious (Epstein-Barr virus, herpes simplex virus, influenza virus, etc.) and noninfectious factors (genetic predisposition, smoking, geographic region of residence, etc.). MS is a progressive demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), which leads to neurodegeneration accompanied by a variety of clinical manifestations. The pathogenesis of MS is characterized by immune-mediated damage to the myelin sheaths of nerve fibers, which is manifested by inflammation, neurosynaptic damage, and destruction of white matter, axons, and blood vessels. Rapid non-evolutionary dietary and lifestyle changes, which are driven by urbanization, industrialization and globalization of the food market, are leading to an increase in most chronic non-communicable diseases, including MS. The effects induced by alimentary factors are due to changes in the microbial composition of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), immune cell function, enzyme systems functioning, etc. The aim of the work is to study the influence of micro/macronutrients, as well as the nature of the diet on the risk of MS development, to assess the role of nutrition in the primary prevention of MS. It has been shown that a diet characterized by a high content of animal fats and trans-isomers of fatty acids (TFA), increased consumption of meat products, but low content of vegetables, fruits and whole-grain products is associated with a higher risk of MS development. Regular inclusion in the diet of sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (vegetable oils, seeds, nuts, marine fish) and vitamin D (fatty fish, caviar, butter, egg yolk) leads to lower relapse rates and less new brain lesions among MS patients. The literature review was conducted using open sources posted in electronic databases: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, World Bank publications, WHO, eLibrary, Cyberleninka, Web of Science.