Impact of Oncologists’ Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Care on Patients’ Access to Palliative Care

Hui, David; Cerana, Maria Agustina; Park, Minjeong; Hess, Kenneth R.; Bruera, Éduardo

doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0090

Cited by 52 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our survey, the program name supportive care was used in approximately one‐third of cancer centers. Previous studies have reported that both patients and oncologists are much more willing to refer patients to palliative care earlier in the disease trajectory if supportive care is used instead of palliative care …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

State of palliative care services at US cancer centers: An updated national survey

Hui

Rosa

Chen

et al. 2020

Cancer

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: This study examined the changes in outpatient palliative care services at US cancer centers over the past decade. METHODS: Between April and August 2018, all National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer centers and a random sample of 1252 non-NCI-designated cancer centers were surveyed. Two surveys used previously in a 2009 national study were sent to each institution: a 22-question cancer center executive survey regarding palliative care infrastructure and attitudes toward palliative care and an 82question palliative care program leader survey regarding detailed palliative care structures and processes. Survey findings from 2018 were compared with 2009 data from 101 cancer center executives and 96 palliative care program leaders. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 69% (140 of 203) for the cancer center executive survey and 75% (123 of 164) for the palliative care program leader survey. Among NCI-designated cancer centers, a significant increase in outpatient palliative care clinics was observed between 2009 and 2018 (59% vs 95%; odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-48.2; P < .001) with no significant changes in inpatient consultation teams (92% vs 90%; P = .71), palliative care units (PCUs; 26% vs 40%; P = .17), or institution-operated hospices (31% vs 18%; P = .14). Among non-NCI-designated cancer centers, there was no significant increase in outpatient palliative care clinics (22% vs 40%; P = .07), inpatient consultation teams (56% vs 68%; P = .27), PCUs (20% vs 18%; P = .76), or institution-operated hospices (42% vs 23%; P = .05). The median interval from outpatient palliative care referral to death increased significantly, particularly for NCI-designated cancer centers (90 vs 180 days; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant growth in outpatient palliative care clinics, there remain opportunities for improvement in the structures and processes of palliative care programs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

State of palliative care services at US cancer centers: An updated national survey

Hui

Rosa

Chen

et al. 2020

Cancer

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Discordance in beliefs about curability was less common in dyads involving oncologists who practiced longer. Experienced oncologists may have a higher propensity or comfort level for discussing prognosis, which can help patients understand their illness. It is also possible that older patients are more likely to believe or trust more experienced oncologists .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beliefs About Advanced Cancer Curability in Older Patients, Their Caregivers, and Oncologists

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Ensuring older patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists have similar beliefs about curability is important. We investigated discordance in beliefs about curability in patient‐oncologist and caregiver‐oncologist dyads. Materials and Methods We used baseline data from a cluster randomized trial assessing whether geriatric assessment improves communication and quality of life in older patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Patients were aged ≥70 years with incurable cancer from community oncology practices. Patients, caregivers, and oncologists were asked: “What do you believe are the chances the cancer will go away and never come back with treatment?” Options were 100%, >50%, 50/50, <50%, and 0% (5‐point scale). Discordance in beliefs about curability was defined as any difference in scale scores (≥3 points were severe). We used multivariate logistic regressions to describe correlates of discordance. Results Discordance was present in 60% (15% severe) of the 336 patient‐oncologist dyads and 52% (16% severe) of the 245 caregiver‐oncologist dyads. Discordance was less common in patient‐oncologist dyads when oncologists practiced longer (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.97) and more common in non‐Hispanic white patients (AOR 5.77, CI 1.90–17.50) and when patients had lung (AOR 1.95, CI 1.29–2.94) or gastrointestinal (AOR 1.55, CI 1.09–2.21) compared with breast cancer. Severe discordance was more common when patients were non‐Hispanic white, had lower income, and had impaired social support. Caregiver‐oncologist discordance was more common when caregivers were non‐Hispanic white (AOR 3.32, CI 1.01–10.94) and reported lower physical health (AOR 0.88, CI 0.78–1.00). Severe discordance was more common when caregivers had lower income and lower anxiety level. Conclusion Discordance in beliefs about curability is common, occasionally severe, and correlated with patient, caregiver, and oncologist characteristics. Implications for Practice Ensuring older patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers have similar beliefs about curability as the oncologist is important. This study investigated discordance in beliefs about curability in patient‐oncologist (PO) and caregiver‐oncologist (CO) dyads. It found that discordance was present in 60% (15% severe) of PO dyads and 52% (16% severe) of CO dyads, raising serious questions about the process by which patients consent to treatment. This study supports the need for interventions targeted at the oncologist, patient, caregiver, and societal levels to improve the delivery of prognostic information and patients’/caregivers’ understanding and acceptance of prognosis.

show abstract

“…One study focused on family physicians and highlighted that the use of specific tools for palliative care needs assessment was useful to address those needs in a timely manner [23]. Finally, several of quantitative studies showed that previous experience, general knowledge of end-of-life care, palliative care education provision for HPs (e.g., workshops and practical training) [35,51,52,58,64] as well as clinical guidelines on palliative care delivery [51] led to greater utilization of palliative care services.…”

Section: Awareness Of Palliative Carementioning

confidence: 99%

Palliative care utilization in oncology and hemato-oncology: a systematic review of cognitive barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare professionals, adult patients, and their families

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Despite the high potential to improve the quality of life of patients and families, palliative care services face significant obstacles to their use. In countries with high-resource health systems, the nonfinancial and nonstructural obstacles to palliative care services are particularly prominent. These are the cognitive barriers-knowledge and communication barriers-to the use of palliative care. To date no systematic review has given the deserved attention to the cognitive barriers and facilitators to palliative care services utilization. This study aims to synthesize knowledge on cognitive barriers and facilitators to palliative care use in oncology and hemato-oncology from the experiences of health professionals, patients, and their families. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. PubMed, PsycINFO, International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care/Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (IAHPC/CINAHL), and Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC) were systematically searched for the main core concepts: palliative care, barriers, facilitators, perspectives, points of view, and related terms and synonyms. After screening of titles, abstracts, and full-texts, 52 studies were included in the qualitative thematic analysis.

show abstract

Impact of Oncologists’ Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Care on Patients’ Access to Palliative Care

Cited by 52 publications

References 21 publications

State of palliative care services at US cancer centers: An updated national survey

State of palliative care services at US cancer centers: An updated national survey

Beliefs About Advanced Cancer Curability in Older Patients, Their Caregivers, and Oncologists

Palliative care utilization in oncology and hemato-oncology: a systematic review of cognitive barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare professionals, adult patients, and their families

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About