2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Operative Management on Recurrence of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Longitudinal Analysis of a Statewide Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study of 6,191 patients confirmed these outcomes (19% vs 25.6%, p < 0.005). However the authors noted a higher mortality rate in the operative group (3.7% vs 2.6%, p = 0.025) [ 17 ]. The debate is still ongoing and conservative treatment remains the standard of care whenever possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study of 6,191 patients confirmed these outcomes (19% vs 25.6%, p < 0.005). However the authors noted a higher mortality rate in the operative group (3.7% vs 2.6%, p = 0.025) [ 17 ]. The debate is still ongoing and conservative treatment remains the standard of care whenever possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the careful observation and switching to LT even when colonic contrast was observed at 24 h. ASBO recurrence frequently occurs due to the inability of non-surgical treatment to resolve itself. [7][8][9] Despite being able to temporally reduce ASBO recurrence, surgical treatment is more invasive, especially for elderly patients with severe risk factors. 8 In addition, surgery may cause subsequent adhesive stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Despite being able to temporally reduce ASBO recurrence, surgical treatment is more invasive, especially for elderly patients with severe risk factors. 8 In addition, surgery may cause subsequent adhesive stenosis. Thus, non-surgical management should be recommended as an initial treatment for patients with ASBO, unless signs of peritonitis, strangulation, or bowel ischemia become apparent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this analysis, our model assumed an encounter-level recurrence rate of 28.8%, which was inferred from a retrospective statewide study of 6191 patients in Tennessee followed from 2007 to 2016. 35 Our analysis required that the recurrence rate be reported at the encounter level as opposed to the patient level (i.e., percentage of SBO encounters that are recurrent versus percentage of patients who experience a recurrence) given our analysis is built upon the annual number of ED encounters for SBO. The reported recurrence rate of 28.8% from this study was the most conservative encounter-level recurrence rate reported in the literature (range, 28.8%-62.0%), but was chosen given it was derived most recently using the largest sample.…”
Section: Sensitivity and Subset Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%