1991
DOI: 10.1017/s0252921100003687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Outdoor Lighting on Moths

Abstract: Outdoor lighting incapacitates and destroys some moths. It disturbs flight, navigation, vision, migration, dispersal, oviposition, mating, feeding, and crypsis. It may also snift circadian rhythms. Lamps may incinerate or desiccate moths, or lead to moth’s destruction by birds, bats, spider, and vehicular traffic. Conservation efforts need to consider disruptive ecological effects of outdoor lighting. Low pressure sodium lamps may reduce these effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
114
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
114
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the installation of street lights in a previously dark area can shift the timing of activity and alter choice of commuting routes from roost to foraging grounds [143]. Light at night, however, provides some bat species with a good foraging ground as they hunt for insects that are attracted by streetlights [144,145]. Perhaps, one of the most reported effect of light pollution is the nocturnal singing of songbirds.…”
Section: (B) Masking Effect Of Moonlightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the installation of street lights in a previously dark area can shift the timing of activity and alter choice of commuting routes from roost to foraging grounds [143]. Light at night, however, provides some bat species with a good foraging ground as they hunt for insects that are attracted by streetlights [144,145]. Perhaps, one of the most reported effect of light pollution is the nocturnal singing of songbirds.…”
Section: (B) Masking Effect Of Moonlightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall order richness was highest at the farm Oupembamewa, followed by Hosea Kutako and Eros Airports. Per light colour order richness was highest at the rural study sites, Hosea Kutako (14) and Oupembamewa (14), order richness was highest at the farm for yellow light and at Hosea Kutako for white light. Overall order diversity was highest at Eros for yellow light (Shannon 1.94) as well as lowest at Eros for orange light (Shannon 1.19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Any assessment of exposure to artificial light should ideally be complemented by an assessment of the sensitivity and resilience of different ecosystems to light pollution. Some groups of species, such as nocturnal invertebrates and bats [42][43][44], are known to be particularly sensitive to artificial light at night. However, the effects on populations of animals and plants, and effects at the level of the ecosystem, are poorly understood [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%