2021
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.76920.1643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Ozone gel, PRF & A-PRF on Pain and Trismus during Tissue Healing after Extraction of Mandibular Third Molars

Abstract: Objective: This prospective study evaluated the impact of ozone gel, conventional PRF (C-PRF) and advanced PRF (A-PRF) on pain and trismus when applied after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Materials and Methods:This study included 48 patients with impacted mandibular third molars. They were randomly divided into 4 groups, group I (control); didn't receive any material in the socket, group II: sockets received ozone gel, group III: sockets received PRF while in group IV: sockets receiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and study groups. While Alkholy et al,51 reported no statisti-cally significant difference in trismus between the study and control groups, Yousef et al,52 and Sivalingam Ozone as a supportive therapy may be use-ful in lowering pain, but it was ineffective in the reduction of trismus and swelling, according to the findings of the current study.It is impossible to provide a practical suggestion for employing ozone as a supportive therapy to reduce trismus, pain, and swelling in lower third molar extractions due to the limits of this research and the extremely low certainty of the studies' findings. To increase the certainty of the evidence, more standardized protocols must be established for this therapy.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…and study groups. While Alkholy et al,51 reported no statisti-cally significant difference in trismus between the study and control groups, Yousef et al,52 and Sivalingam Ozone as a supportive therapy may be use-ful in lowering pain, but it was ineffective in the reduction of trismus and swelling, according to the findings of the current study.It is impossible to provide a practical suggestion for employing ozone as a supportive therapy to reduce trismus, pain, and swelling in lower third molar extractions due to the limits of this research and the extremely low certainty of the studies' findings. To increase the certainty of the evidence, more standardized protocols must be established for this therapy.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Articles dealing with the management of pediatric and nonsurgical cancer patients (cancer surgery) with CPSP were excluded from this evidence-based guideline. The severity of pain was assessed with the visual analog scale 45 , brief pain inventory 46 , and leeds assessment of neuropathic signs and symptoms 47 (Annex 2, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/MS9/A227 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%