2011 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications 2011
DOI: 10.1109/itst.2011.6060086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of packet loss on CACC string stability performance

Abstract: Abstract-Recent development in wireless technology enables communication between vehicles. The concept of Co-operative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) -which uses wireless communication between vehicles -aims at string stable behaviour in a platoon of vehicles. "String stability" means any non-zero position, speed, and acceleration errors of an individual vehicle in a string do not amplify when they propagate upstream. In this paper, we will discuss the string stability of CACC and evaluate its performance with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these proposals manage to keep the channel access delay and packet loss at acceptable levels, most of them are designed to obtain benefits for generic vehicular ad hoc networks, and not for specific applications such as platooning. Some works focus on practical issues and their impacts on platooning performance, such as [11] and [12]. In [11] the impact of packet loss on the performance of platooning applications was evaluated, and in [12] antenna placement and its impact on the packet error rate is evaluated using real-world experiments.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these proposals manage to keep the channel access delay and packet loss at acceptable levels, most of them are designed to obtain benefits for generic vehicular ad hoc networks, and not for specific applications such as platooning. Some works focus on practical issues and their impacts on platooning performance, such as [11] and [12]. In [11] the impact of packet loss on the performance of platooning applications was evaluated, and in [12] antenna placement and its impact on the packet error rate is evaluated using real-world experiments.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works focus on practical issues and their impacts on platooning performance, such as [11] and [12]. In [11] the impact of packet loss on the performance of platooning applications was evaluated, and in [12] antenna placement and its impact on the packet error rate is evaluated using real-world experiments. However, most research about platooning is related to strategies for improving timing and reliability either through the introduction of TDMA slots, [2], [3], [7], [10], [13] or through retransmissions [4], [5].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Are copies of M delivered to all string members within stipulated time bounds? In cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) approaches, where string stability is a major issue [13], consequences of V2V message losses and time-unbounded message deliveries regarding safety are ignored, with few exceptions [14,15,16]. Furthermore, data collected in platooning experiments show that it is inappropriate to rely on V2V broadcast from the lead vehicle [17].…”
Section: Limited Scope and Relayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vehiclefollowing controller efficiently describes the vehicle dynamics and cooperative maneuvers residing in the system. The performance and robustness of a CACC consensus algorithm were discussed in [8], where packet loss, network failures, and beaconing frequencies were all taken into consideration when the simulation framework is built with the CACC controller developed by [9]. Di Bernardo et al [10] designed a distributed control protocol to solve the platooning problem, which depends on a local action of the vehicle itself and a cooperative action received from the leader and neighboring vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%