2005
DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.9.1089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Participant and Physician Intervention Preferences on Randomized Trials

Michael King,
Irwin Nazareth,
Fiona Lampe
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
246
4
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
9
246
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Choice of intervention deserves further consideration within educational and behavioral studies [7]; [27]. Our findings support the idea that participants in a randomized clinical trial are likely to respond differently based on their preference for the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Choice of intervention deserves further consideration within educational and behavioral studies [7]; [27]. Our findings support the idea that participants in a randomized clinical trial are likely to respond differently based on their preference for the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Further, often such interventions address psychological factors such as confidence to change behavior or the belief that taking an action will produce the desired outcome and various learning events attempt to elicit these responses [6]. The extent to which a patient prefers the pedagogical means by which this new learning is expected to occur may influence results [7]. An underlying assumption in the literature regarding choice is that people will do better in an intervention that meets their expectations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 Some have implicated a selection bias in the successful outcomes of studies testing vegetarian diets. 19 Our experience in this study does not support this notion. Only 8 of the 932 candidates we screened declined participation because of concern that they would be assigned to a vegetarian diet and no one withdrew from the study because they were not assigned to the diet of their choice.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…[16][17][18][19] Conceptual models such as behavioral choice theory 20 postulate that those who are matched to treatment based on their personal choices will demonstrate better outcomes than those assigned to a treatment that does not match their personal preference. The few studies that have examined the effect of providing participants their preferred weight-loss treatment have produced inconsistent findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome assessment would involve calculation of the proportion of a target population who successfully negotiate the stages of access to receive appropriate high-quality care, the distribution of care according to need and the effectiveness of that care. Although there are examples in the literature that attempt to apply this design 34,354,355 and methods that might be able to accommodate it, 356 we did not locate any studies that provided a comprehensive assessment of access, equity and effectiveness. It is likely that exploration of these issues will require mixed-methods research combined with enhanced use of routinely collected data from public health and provider sources and creative use of comparators for intervention sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%