2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.06.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of particle size gradients on the apparent efficiency of chromatographic columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigation of capacity gradients is of potential interest because an increasing capacity gradient should result in peak focusing. As with the particle size gradient study of Fekete et al [17], capacity gradients are not expected to provide any efficiency benefit under isocratic conditions. Under such conditions the peak focusing effect of an increasing capacity gradient is offset by the relatively slow release of the band due to the high capacity at the outlet of the column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Investigation of capacity gradients is of potential interest because an increasing capacity gradient should result in peak focusing. As with the particle size gradient study of Fekete et al [17], capacity gradients are not expected to provide any efficiency benefit under isocratic conditions. Under such conditions the peak focusing effect of an increasing capacity gradient is offset by the relatively slow release of the band due to the high capacity at the outlet of the column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Fekete et al published a theoretical study of the impact of a particle size gradient on chromatographic efficiency [17]. They concluded that under isocratic conditions a particle size gradient would provide no performance benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiency values above 20000 plates m -1 for capillary monolithic columns are considered satisfactory for chromatographic separations, 37 although the literature presents values between 90000-110000 plates m -1 for other types of hybrid monoliths. [38][39][40] For asymmetry, values between 0.9 and 1.2 are considered satisfactory according to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). 41 To compare the columns having monoliths 3 and 4, a mixture of alkylbenzenes was used, as seen in Figure 6.…”
Section: Chromatographic Evaluation Chromatographic Evaluation Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%