Impact of patient comfort on diagnostic image quality during PET/MR exam: A quantitative survey study for clinical workflow management

Abstract

Background PET/MR is transferring from a powerful scientific research tool to an imaging modality in clinical routine practice. Whole body PET/MR screening usually takes 30–50 minutes to finish, during which a few factors might induce patient discomfort and further cause degraded image quality. The aim of this report is to investigate the patients' perception of the imaging procedure and its correlation with image quality. Methods One hundred and twenty patients (63 males and 57 females, average age = 51.3 years, range 22–70 years) who had been diagnosed with cancer or had previous history of cancer were recruited and scanned with a simultaneous PET/MR system. A questionnaire was given to all patients retrospectively after the PET/MR scan, which has nine questions to assess patients' feeling of the scan on a Likert scale scoring system (1–5, 1 as most satisfied). All PET/MR images were also visually examined by two experts independently to evaluate the quality of the images. Six body locations were assessed and each location was evaluated also with a Likert scale scoring system (1–5, 5 as the best quality). Mann–Whitney U­test was used for statistical analysis to check if there is significant correlation between image quality and patient perceptions. Results With a total of 120 patients, 118 questionnaires were filled and returned for analysis. The patients’ characteristics were summarized in Table 4. The statistics of the patients’ perception in the questionnaire were illustrated in Tables 5–7. Statistical significant correlations were found between MR image quality and patients’ characteristics/perception. Conclusion Our results show that PET/MR scanning is generally safe and comfortable for most of the patients. Statistical analysis does not support the hypothesis that bad patient’s perception leads to degraded image quality.

Effectiveness of mindfulness‐based interventions on mental, cognitive outcomes and neuroplastic changes in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…Large funding is thus required for studies seeking to utilize MRIs. Additionally, the physical and emotional discomfort from the scan duration and prolonged isolation leads to panic, and possibly claustrophobia (Chen et al, 2019).…”

Spirometry‐based reconstruction of real‐time cardiac MRI: Motion control and quantification of heart–lung interactions

“…A questionnaire was used to assess anxiety and comfort during scanning (modified from Chen et al 12 (see Supporting Information S3).…”

A head-to-head comparison of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT and 2-[18F]FDG PET/MR in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma under different disease settings

“…The median delay for PET/MR was 1.3 hours. Further details regarding PET/MR scan have been described in previous studies (10,11). Brie y, PET images and MRI sequences, including T1 weighted images (T1WI), T2 weighted images (T2WI) with and without fat saturation (T2-fs), and diffusion-weighted images (DWI), were acquired at axial, sagittal, and coronal plane positions.…”