2018
DOI: 10.7150/ijms.23107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome

Abstract: Objective: To classify the infants into 9 blocks based on the deviation of both placental weight (PW) and fetal/placental weight ratio (F/P) Z score and compared the incident rate of perinatal death in each of the small for date (SFD) vs. appropriate for date (AFD) vs. heavy for date (HFD) groups.Methods: The study population consisted of 93,034 placentas/infants from women who vaginally delivered a singleton infant. They were classified into 3 groups according to infants' weight: SFD (n=3,379), AFD (n=81,143)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The placental weight (on average 525 g) was also lower than normative values for full‐term babies (between 668 and 680 g) (Almog et al, ). Studies have demonstrated that there is a higher incidence of fetal heart rate variability and of birth asphyxia with shorter or longer cords (Balkawade & Shinde, ), and that fetal/placental weight ratio may be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes (Matsuda et al, ). However, the sample is very small to make a valid conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The placental weight (on average 525 g) was also lower than normative values for full‐term babies (between 668 and 680 g) (Almog et al, ). Studies have demonstrated that there is a higher incidence of fetal heart rate variability and of birth asphyxia with shorter or longer cords (Balkawade & Shinde, ), and that fetal/placental weight ratio may be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes (Matsuda et al, ). However, the sample is very small to make a valid conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oversized placentas are also often observed at an early gestational age . In a previous study, we defined inappropriately heavy placenta as cases with a high PW Z score (over +1.28 SD) and low F/P Z score (under −1.28 SD) (Category I) and found that the proportion in the LFD‐VD group was 0.5% . However, in cases of high‐risk pregnancy, such as HDP, especially during early gestation, CS seems to be performed due to maternal or fetal indications, such as intractable hypertensive crisis, threatened damage to vital organs, fetal growth restriction and non‐reassuring fetal status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the nine groups shown in Figure were made, and we labeled them from top‐left (Category A: inappropriately light placenta, relatively heavy infant) to bottom‐right (Category I: inappropriately heavy placenta, relatively small infant). Category E was located in the center of the nine category classifications (9‐CC) and considered a control for the remaining eight groups, as described previously …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations