2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of polymorphisms in blaZ, blaR1 and blaI genes and their relationship with β-lactam resistance in S. aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these genes are located on plasmids but are also present on chromosomes. 87 When β-lactam antibiotics lacks, BlaI binds to the conserved sequence TACA/TGTA of blaZ promoter, which inhibits blaZ transcription and thus inhibits the production of β-lactamase. However, when β-lactam antibiotics exists, the antibiotics can bind with blaR1 to remove the inhibitory effect of blaI-blaZ and then produce β-lactamase.…”
Section: Resistance Mechanisms Of Mrsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these genes are located on plasmids but are also present on chromosomes. 87 When β-lactam antibiotics lacks, BlaI binds to the conserved sequence TACA/TGTA of blaZ promoter, which inhibits blaZ transcription and thus inhibits the production of β-lactamase. However, when β-lactam antibiotics exists, the antibiotics can bind with blaR1 to remove the inhibitory effect of blaI-blaZ and then produce β-lactamase.…”
Section: Resistance Mechanisms Of Mrsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is most likely driven by the different bacteria that were present in contaminated samples contrasted to controls. Genes involved in macrolide resistance were seen in contaminated kibble as well as beta-lactam genes bla R1 and bla I, which influence expression of bla Z and penicillin binding protein 2a (PBP 2a) and contribute to methicillin resistance ( 35 , 36 ). The bla 1 gene was observed in control samples, typically associated with ampicillin resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of milk inflammation indicators, i.e., SCC and DSCC, samples were grouped as depicted in Figure 4. [20] were used: group 1 (SCC < 200,000 cells/mL and DSCC < 65%), group 2 (SCC < 200,000 cells/mL and DSCC ≥ 65%), group 3 (SCC ≥ 200,000 cells/mL and DSCC ≥ 65%), and group 4 (SCC ≥ 200,000 cells/mL and DSCC < 65%).…”
Section: Pathogens and Udder Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In group 4, where only SCC was high, pathogen DNA was detected in 42.93% and 58.62% of STER and DHI samples, respectively. In both the sets, the group with the greatest number of samples free of pathogens was group 1, where both SCC and DSCC were low (35.28% for STER and [20] were used: group 1 (SCC < 200,000 cells/mL and DSCC < 65%), group 2 (SCC < 200,000 cells/mL and DSCC ≥ 65%), group 3 (SCC ≥ 200,000 cells/mL and DSCC ≥ 65%), and group 4 (SCC ≥ 200,000 cells/mL and DSCC < 65%).…”
Section: Pathogens and Udder Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%