2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection at different periods of pregnancy on subsequent reproductive performance in gilts and sows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
69
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The values gained in experiment, such as 14.75 and 14.50 live-born piglets indicate high health standard of sows, which is demonstrated by the results found by Nevrkla et al (2012), who reported 11.25 live-born piglets before repopulation and a er the repopulation of the breed the value increased to 14.63 live-born piglets. Improvement of health status of sows with the infl uence on reproduction is documented also by Olanratmanee et al (2010), who found 10.30 live-born piglets per litter for sows with health problems, against 11.10 live born piglets for sows without health problems. These fi ndings suggest that induction of SPF herds improves numbers of live-born piglets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values gained in experiment, such as 14.75 and 14.50 live-born piglets indicate high health standard of sows, which is demonstrated by the results found by Nevrkla et al (2012), who reported 11.25 live-born piglets before repopulation and a er the repopulation of the breed the value increased to 14.63 live-born piglets. Improvement of health status of sows with the infl uence on reproduction is documented also by Olanratmanee et al (2010), who found 10.30 live-born piglets per litter for sows with health problems, against 11.10 live born piglets for sows without health problems. These fi ndings suggest that induction of SPF herds improves numbers of live-born piglets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Damgaard et al (2003) piont out that litter size aff ects survival of piglets a er birth. Olanratmanee et al (2010) report 12.10 born piglets per a litter from sows in good hygienic conditions against 11.70 from sows in poor hygienic conditions, which indicates the need of breeding sows in good health status.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Von der Lage and Hoy (2008) analysed reproductive performance in sows in repopulated herds on five farms and found increased reproductive parameters in sows of the repopulated herds and maintenance of high health status usually for several years when strict rules were followed. Olanratmanee et al (2010) observed increased performance parameters in sows in good hygienic conditions, which highlights the necessity to keep the basic herd of sows in high health status. Results of our experiment document that the highest performance was achieved in sows at the 3 rd parity and it decreased later, which corresponds to the results published by Simmins et al (1993) who observed increasing fertility till the 3 rd to the 4 th parity with subsequent continuous decrease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Decisive factors are age or weight of a sow. Also Olanratmanee et al (2010) state that fertility reaches its top level at the fourth parity and later it gradually decreases. Todd (2006) reported that the number of live-born piglets was the lowest in the first litter, then it increased up to the 4 th to 5 th parity, later its level stabilized before it started to decrease around 7 th to 8 th litter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar trend was observed also in the genotype II, however without statistical significance of the correlation between the number of live-born piglets and the losses of piglets before weaning. Olanratmanee et al (2010) described a highly significant correlation between the total number of piglets and the number of live-born piglets. Škorjanc et al (2007) reported a positive correlation (r = 0.815) with a highly statistically significant dependence (P ≤ 0.01) between the number of live-born piglets and the number of reared piglets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%