I n this issue of Haematologica, Itzykson et al. for the ALFA group show that the choice of post-remission therapy has seemingly little effect on duration of survival after complete remission in patients aged 65-70 years old with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1 In more detail, survival times were similar between patients treated with: (i) six courses of relatively "less intense" outpatient therapy, (ii) one course of inpatient therapy containing 45 mg/m 2 daunorubicin (or 9 mg/m 2 idarubicin) daily on days 1-4 + 200 mg/m 2 cytarabine daily on days 1-7 thus amounting, in total, to four times more anthracycline and 2.5 times more cytarabine than administered in the outpatient regimen, or (iii) two courses of inpatient therapy with a 4-to 6-fold increase in anthracycline and over 10-fold increase in cytarabine compared to the outpatient regimen. In contrast, a previous ALFA study found that patients aged 65 years or older who were randomly assigned to the outpatient regimen rather than to the one course inpatient regimen survived longer after achieving complete remission and also had a longer relapse-free survival. 2 The difference did, however, seem more statistically significant (P=0.03) than clinically relevant (median survivals after complete remission of approximately 24 rather than 18 months). In neither study 1,2 was the intensity of post-remission therapy more relevant