2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0925-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of postfire logging on soil bacterial and fungal communities and soil biogeochemistry in a mixed-conifer forest in central Oregon

Abstract: Aims Postfire logging recoups the economic value of timber killed by wildfire, but whether such forest management activity supports or impedes forest recovery in stands differing in structure from historic conditions remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of mechanical logging after wildfire on soil bacterial and fungal communities and other measures influencing soil productivity. Methods We compared soil bacterial and fungal communities and biogeochemical responses of 1) soils comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(149 reference statements)
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, soil bulk density increases, but soil organic matter, porosity, and water holding capacity decrease as cutting intensity increases, echoing the results reported in the literature [49][50][51][52]. Likewise, an increase in cutting intensity (even a low intensity of selective cutting relative to non-cutting) could cause loss in soil nutrients (N, P, and K), which is parallel to the finding of existing studies [46,[51][52][53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In general, soil bulk density increases, but soil organic matter, porosity, and water holding capacity decrease as cutting intensity increases, echoing the results reported in the literature [49][50][51][52]. Likewise, an increase in cutting intensity (even a low intensity of selective cutting relative to non-cutting) could cause loss in soil nutrients (N, P, and K), which is parallel to the finding of existing studies [46,[51][52][53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Our observations demonstrated that a decline in the soil quality is caused by the reduction in porosity, microbial quantity except catalase, and the enzyme activity of soil with clear-cutting supporting the third hypothesis. Previous studies have shown that soil quality also declines due to human disturbance such as clear-cutting [6,53]. They are mutually validated by the present study.…”
Section: Clear-cuttingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…, Jennings et al. ), McGinnis et al. () found no difference in shrub or grass cover between salvage logged and control sites in the Sierra Nevada.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%