2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of potential bio-subsoilers on pore network of a severely compacted subsoil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X‐ray computed microtomography (μCT) combines the penetrating capacity of X‐rays with 3D volume reconstruction to observe the internal 3D structure of objects in a non‐destructive manner (Cnudde & Boone, 2013). μCT has been applied extensively to agricultural soils to investigate the impact of subsurface structures on crucial soil functions such as water infiltration (Jarvis et al, 2017; Katuwal et al, 2015; Müller et al, 2018; Pot et al, 2020; Tracy et al, 2015), root–pore interactions and patterns of plant growth (Hu et al, 2020; Lucas et al, 2019; Pulido‐Moncada et al, 2020). In recent years, the technique has been extended to saltmarsh substrates (Dale et al, 2019; Spencer et al, 2017; Van Putte et al, 2019); however, distinguishing roots from pores is challenging because their greyscale values overlap due to the partial volume effect (Cnudde & Boone, 2013; Helliwell et al, 2013), especially in these complex heterogeneous substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X‐ray computed microtomography (μCT) combines the penetrating capacity of X‐rays with 3D volume reconstruction to observe the internal 3D structure of objects in a non‐destructive manner (Cnudde & Boone, 2013). μCT has been applied extensively to agricultural soils to investigate the impact of subsurface structures on crucial soil functions such as water infiltration (Jarvis et al, 2017; Katuwal et al, 2015; Müller et al, 2018; Pot et al, 2020; Tracy et al, 2015), root–pore interactions and patterns of plant growth (Hu et al, 2020; Lucas et al, 2019; Pulido‐Moncada et al, 2020). In recent years, the technique has been extended to saltmarsh substrates (Dale et al, 2019; Spencer et al, 2017; Van Putte et al, 2019); however, distinguishing roots from pores is challenging because their greyscale values overlap due to the partial volume effect (Cnudde & Boone, 2013; Helliwell et al, 2013), especially in these complex heterogeneous substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous study in intact soil columns also demonstrated that fodder radish did not positively impact the pore network of the compacted subsoil in Aarslev; however, other species such as lucerne and chicory ( Cichorium intybus L.) showed greater potential as biosubsoilers by creating a larger, more connected, and complex pore network in the compacted layer (Pulido‐Moncada, Katuwal, Ren, Cornelis, & Munkholm, 2020a). Further studies involving different species with the potential to penetrate hard layers could provide better quantification of CC‐induced changes in the anisotropy of soil physical parameters in compacted subsoils.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…An alternative to limit deleterious effects and maintain the favorable structural change obtained with deep soil management practices is to associate these with cover crops. Cover crops induce changes in pore connectivity (Pulido-Moncada et al, 2020), which is specifically reported by Galdos et al (2020) for Brachiaria sp., that enhance hydraulic conductivity and water availability in the root-soil interface (Carminati et al, 2016) In fact,. Brachiaria in maize inter-row contributed for increasing saturated hydraulic conductivity by up to five times the values observed in uncultivated maize inter-rows (Scarabeli et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%