1999
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/21.1.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of predation by Mysis relicta on zooplankton in Flathead Lake, Montana, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The broad shifts we observed in the benthic communities of San Francisco Bay, from predominantly surface algal consumers to subsurface detritivores, are consistent with changes in the base of the food web (Levin et al 2006); belowground plant detritus was 4.3 times more abundant in Spartina-invaded sediments than in the tidal flat during our study (Neira et al 2005). To date the most fundamental changes documented in food web structure following species invasion have resulted from top-down effects of predatory fish (Hurlbert et al 1972), zooplankton (Spencer et al 1991(Spencer et al , 1999, and suspensionfeeding bivalves (Alpine and Cloern 1992). Our studies suggest that plant influences on trophic structure interact with modifications of flow and sediment conditions, recruitment, and predation to transform wetland ecosystems.…”
Section: Trophic Modificationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The broad shifts we observed in the benthic communities of San Francisco Bay, from predominantly surface algal consumers to subsurface detritivores, are consistent with changes in the base of the food web (Levin et al 2006); belowground plant detritus was 4.3 times more abundant in Spartina-invaded sediments than in the tidal flat during our study (Neira et al 2005). To date the most fundamental changes documented in food web structure following species invasion have resulted from top-down effects of predatory fish (Hurlbert et al 1972), zooplankton (Spencer et al 1991(Spencer et al , 1999, and suspensionfeeding bivalves (Alpine and Cloern 1992). Our studies suggest that plant influences on trophic structure interact with modifications of flow and sediment conditions, recruitment, and predation to transform wetland ecosystems.…”
Section: Trophic Modificationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This is because, at night, Mysis migrate up from the hypolimnion and lower metalimnion, into the upper metalimnion and lower epilimnion. D. mendotae have been shown to simultaneously migrate away from the regions inhabited by Mysis to higher regions in the epilimnion (Bowers and Vanderploeg 1982 (Clarke and Bennet 2003) and Flathead Lake, Montana (Spencer et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been hypothesized that this vulnerability to Mysis contributes to a vertical diel migration by Daphnia spp. that minimizes spatial overlap, and therefore vulnerability (Bowers and Vanderploeg 1982, Spencer et al 1999, Clarke and Bennet 2003. Based on these patterns, we hypothesized that Mysis induce a change in Daphnia mendotae behavior, in particular vertical migration patterns, and we tested this hypothesis with laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is well documented (Lasenby & Langford 1973, Richards et al 1975, Kinsten & Olsén 1981, Langeland 1981, 1988, Bowers and Vanderploeg 1982. In Lake Tahoe, the dominant zooplankters Bosmina and 2 species of Daphnia virtually disappeared after the introduction of M. diluviana (formerly M. relicta) (Richards et al 1975), and Bosmina and Daphnia were the preferred prey in Flathead Lake (Spencer et al 1999). In Lake Selbusjøen, the source lake for mysids in Lake Jonsvaten, cladocerans were reduced to a very low biomass 5 to 6 yr after the introduction of M. relicta in 1973.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More re-cent studies have added nuanced information to the omnivorous feeding habits of M. relicta (Branstrator et al 2000, Johannsson et al 2001, Lasenby & Shi 2004, Ikonen et al 2005, Scharf & Koschel 2005. After introductions both in North America and Scandinavia, it gradually became evident that M. relicta had the ability to reduce zooplankton abundance and change species composition through its predatory behavior (Lasenby & Langford 1973, Threlkeld et al 1980, Kinsten & Olsén 1981, Lasenby et al 1986, Nero & Sprules 1986a, Spencer et al 1999. In many of the target lakes, M. relicta turned out to be an effective competitor with planktivorous fish for zooplankton prey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%