2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-2194(00)00095-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of preharvest application of biological control agents on postharvest diseases of fresh fruits and vegetables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
132
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
132
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Postharvest disinfectant treatments had shown negative effects on the litchi and mango microflora (Govender et al, 2005). It is also evident from this study that the addition of PPCB004, the biocontrol agent in the integrated treatment with 1-MCP helped in maintaining the natural microbial ecological balance (Gerhardson, 2002;Ippolito and Nigro, 2000). Furthermore, the integrated treatment with 1-MCP þ PPCB004 reduced the incidence and severity of postharvest diseases by reducing the total fungal population and maintaining higher bacterial and yeast populations on the fruit surface.…”
Section: Recovery Of B Amyloliquefaciens Ppcb004mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Postharvest disinfectant treatments had shown negative effects on the litchi and mango microflora (Govender et al, 2005). It is also evident from this study that the addition of PPCB004, the biocontrol agent in the integrated treatment with 1-MCP helped in maintaining the natural microbial ecological balance (Gerhardson, 2002;Ippolito and Nigro, 2000). Furthermore, the integrated treatment with 1-MCP þ PPCB004 reduced the incidence and severity of postharvest diseases by reducing the total fungal population and maintaining higher bacterial and yeast populations on the fruit surface.…”
Section: Recovery Of B Amyloliquefaciens Ppcb004mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Numerous authors have evaluated the efficacy of BCAs against post-harvest diseases under field conditions over a single year (Benbow and Sugar 1999;Chand-Goyal and Spotts 1996;Leibinger et al 1997), and highly variable results have been obtained in multi-year field experiments where a BCA against B. cinerea was applied (Kovach et al 2000, Sutton et al 1997Tronsmo and Dennis 1977). Ippolito and Nigro (2000) stressed that successful pre-harvest application of an antagonist depends on many factors such as rain, wind, temperature, and relative humidity. Elad and Kirshner (1992) likewise suggested that microclimatic conditions have a greater effect than nutrient availability on the establishment of Trichoderma on the phylloplane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most BCAs of post-harvest apple pathogens have been isolated from the apple surface, they should be able to adapt to the environmental conditions existing on this surface (chemical treatment, sun light, rain, dry conditions). Ippolito and Nigro (2000) have stressed the ability of some BCAs to pre-colonise the fruit surface or wounds immediately before harvest, so that wounds inflicted during harvest can be colonised by the antagonist prior to colonisation by the pathogen. Furthermore, several studies (Janisiewicz 1988;Wisniewski and Wilson 1992) have shown the ability of some BCAs to colonise wounds for long periods under dry conditions and to produce extracellular components which improve their survival and decrease colonisation of sites by pathogenic fungi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biocontrol of postharvest fruit decays is achievable by postharvest application of antagonists and by preharvest spraying of biocontrol agents in the field (Benbow and Sugar 1999;Korsten et al, 1997;Leibinger et al, 1997;Teixidõ et al, 1998a). In the latter practice, the antagonist is applied just before harvest so that it can colonize the fruit surface and any wounds inflicted during harvest before the arrival of wound pathogens (Ippolito and Nigro, 2000). Yet authors highlight the very real practical problem of promoting the effective establishment of prospective antagonists in a natural environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%