2020
DOI: 10.26502/josm.511500029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Preoperative Intra-articular Injection on Infection Rates Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Over 19,000 Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is still controversial whether intra-articular injections before TKA increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Some meta-analyses of PJI were conducted after TKA or total hip arthroplasty (THA); [19][20][21] however, the results were contradictory, emphasizing the lack of evidence in existing studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still controversial whether intra-articular injections before TKA increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Some meta-analyses of PJI were conducted after TKA or total hip arthroplasty (THA); [19][20][21] however, the results were contradictory, emphasizing the lack of evidence in existing studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, there were 113,032 patients in the IASI group and 256,987 patients in the control group. Nine studies investigated the time intervals between IASIs and TKA [ 4 , 15 17 , 19 , 25 , 27 , 31 , 32 ]. In making the diagnosis of PJI, seven studies were based on microbiologic culture results and the other seven studies relied on the relevant disease codes, such as the Current Procedural Terminology code and the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision code regarding postoperative infections and operative procedures to address them [ 4 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall risk of bias was assessed to be low in twelve studies based on ROBINS-I assessment [ 4 , 14 17 , 25 , 27 , 31 33 , 35 , 36 ]. Moderate risk of bias was assigned to two studies [ 19 , 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations