Treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed myeloma has been a rapidly moving field because of an improved understanding of disease biology and access to new drugs. Decades ago we learned that "more" was not necessarily "better", especially when the "more" involved combinations of alkylators with steroids, which was associated with greater toxicity and more complications. 1 When the "novel" agents [immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs)] were brought to the field a decade ago, they subsequently demonstrated greater efficacy and were deemed safer in combinations, leading to a push to combine agents for newly diagnosed patients. This much-needed change is now extending to the relapse setting as well. Recent phase 3 trials have suggested that combinations of these new agents with each other, or with alkylatorbased therapy resulted in deeper responses and prolonged duration of remission and overall survival. [2][3][4][5] Given the relative wealth of new agents in development for myeloma, identifying ideal effective combination therapies with minimal overlapping toxicities at various phases of myeloma treatment is an important goal for our current treatment approaches with the intent of curing a larger fraction of newly diagnosed and relapsed myeloma patients.
Goals of therapyThe goal of therapy in both the transplant-eligible or transplantineligible myeloma patients in the upfront setting is to achieve the maximal possible response rapidly, with minimal toxicity and to improve performance status. In the transplant eligible patients, an additional goal is to utilize therapy that does not limit the peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. The goals of therapy in the relapsed setting are slightly different. With prior regimen and disease related toxicities, the ultimate aim of treatment here is to achieve a good balance between the efficacy and toxicity of the regimen. Several disease-related (biology of disease, staging, chromosomal abnormalities), treatment-related (prior drug therapy, regimen related toxicities, prior depth, and duration of response) and patient-related factors (comorbidities, performance status of the patient, renal and hepatic impairment, susceptibility to infections) influence the choice of the treatment regimen in relapsed patients.