2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of previous coronary artery bypass surgery on clinical outcome after percutaneous interventions with second generation drug-eluting stents in TWENTE trial and Non-Enrolled TWENTE registry

Abstract: Patients with previous CABG showed a favorable safety profile after PCI with second-generation DES. Nevertheless, their TVR rate was still much higher, driven by more repeat revascularizations after PCI of degenerated vein grafts. In native coronary lesions, there was no such difference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another retrospective analysis used a historical control group to show, at 1‐year follow‐up, no significant differences in target vessel revascularization between early versus newer‐generation DESs (10.2% versus 10.7%) 33. Our group previously reported a target vessel revascularization rate of 9.4% in patients with a history of CABG at 1‐year follow‐up 14. The difference in event rate from the above‐mentioned study may be best explained by dissimilarities in study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Another retrospective analysis used a historical control group to show, at 1‐year follow‐up, no significant differences in target vessel revascularization between early versus newer‐generation DESs (10.2% versus 10.7%) 33. Our group previously reported a target vessel revascularization rate of 9.4% in patients with a history of CABG at 1‐year follow‐up 14. The difference in event rate from the above‐mentioned study may be best explained by dissimilarities in study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This difference in cardiac mortality from the aforementioned studies may be largely explained by differences in study population and treatment. In the current study, we assessed a consecutive series of patients who were treated with newer‐generation DESs for all clinical syndromes except ST‐segment–elevation MI,14, 22 whereas other studies with long‐term follow‐up exclusively examined patients with ST‐segment–elevation MI or patients with acute coronary syndromes 10, 11, 17. Furthermore, these patients had been treated with or without PCI—before the introduction of the newer‐generation DES 11, 17…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations