2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of primary nozzle area ratio on the performance of ejector refrigeration system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters include the nozzle area ratio [38], the mixing area ratio [39], and the length-to-diameter ratio [40][41][42]. A greater mass ow rate is produced by a larger nozzle area ratio [43]. The ratio of the mixing area to the neck area is known as the mixing area ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters include the nozzle area ratio [38], the mixing area ratio [39], and the length-to-diameter ratio [40][41][42]. A greater mass ow rate is produced by a larger nozzle area ratio [43]. The ratio of the mixing area to the neck area is known as the mixing area ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage of using steam as the working fluid over modern refrigerants is that the waste steam or steam tab from industrial boilers can be directly used to drive the ejector, while for the refrigerant, the heat exchanger is required to generate refrigerant vapor to operate the ejector. Thus, the practical use of the steam ejector refrigerator has been the main focus of several researchers [23][24][25][26][27]. The main aim is to improve the system COP or entrainment ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This critical operating condition is determined by the common performance curves in which the entrainment ratio (Rm) or system COP versus the condenser saturation pressure is illustrated. Therefore, an ejector performance assessment is extensively discussed using the common performance curve as proposed by [16,17,24]. Their aims were to indicate the performance improvement via geometrical optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%