2022
DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2022.2039690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of processing and storage on protein digestibility and bioavailability of legumes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Palafox-Carlos and Ayala-Zavala, 28 Jakobek, 29 Tomas and Beekwilder 30 and Gu and Bk 31 agreed that phenolic compounds are capable of binding to protein and polysaccharides on the cell wall at different active sites due to their structural characteristics of hydrophobic aromatic rings and hydrophilic hydroxyl groups, which require the action of enzymes and gut microflora to release and break them down. The inconsistency of the total phenolic concentration among the selected tomato varieties probably resulted from their different chemical compositions, especially their levels of dietary fiber, which could interact with the phenols by hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions and covalent bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Palafox-Carlos and Ayala-Zavala, 28 Jakobek, 29 Tomas and Beekwilder 30 and Gu and Bk 31 agreed that phenolic compounds are capable of binding to protein and polysaccharides on the cell wall at different active sites due to their structural characteristics of hydrophobic aromatic rings and hydrophilic hydroxyl groups, which require the action of enzymes and gut microflora to release and break them down. The inconsistency of the total phenolic concentration among the selected tomato varieties probably resulted from their different chemical compositions, especially their levels of dietary fiber, which could interact with the phenols by hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions and covalent bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In vitro digestion could be applied to mimic the body condition and estimate the bioaccessibility of nutrients and bioactive compounds in food after consumption (Pavez‐Guajardo et al, 2020). Recent studies have estimated the effect of in vitro digestion on the phenolics compounds and antioxidant capacity of various vegetables, legumes, and fruits (Gu et al, 2022; Ketnawa et al, 2021). However, the available information on the in vitro digestion of sesame seeds is very limited and the bioaccessibility of sesame seeds after colonic fermentation could not be found as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of secondary metabolites, such as phenolic compounds, phytic acid, and enzymatic inhibitors, the accumulation of β-sheet and α-helix protein secondary structure [ 54 ], and the predominance of globular proteins that fold into densely packed structures are responsible for proteins less prone to digestibility [ 55 ], determining much lower values of protein digestibility in legumes (around 75%) than the ones determined for the animal protein (90%) [ 56 ]. As previously mentioned, [ 54 ] despite the differences between the vegetable and the animal protein digestibility, the IVPD values in legume flours are expected to increase after applying traditional (e.g., cooking, extrusion, germination, and fermentation) or emerging processing methods (e.g., high-pressure processing (HPP), ultrasound, irradiation, pulsed electric field (PEF), and microwave).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%