2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of protein and ligand impurities on ITC-derived protein–ligand thermodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…35 The ITC results shown in Figure 4 were corrected for dilution effects by subtracting the reference data measured in identical series of injections into buffer, and fit the Table 2. More specifically, electrostatic binding between SOD and Pb(Ac) 2 was confirmed by negative ΔH and positive ΔS values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 The ITC results shown in Figure 4 were corrected for dilution effects by subtracting the reference data measured in identical series of injections into buffer, and fit the Table 2. More specifically, electrostatic binding between SOD and Pb(Ac) 2 was confirmed by negative ΔH and positive ΔS values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence spectroscopy and thermophoresis require labeling Lw ith af luorophore,and affects Lsbinding to Pand, thus,the accuracy of the K d measurements. [6] An inherent source of inaccuracyinK d values determined by direct mass-spectrometry (MS) is ashift of the equilibrium in Equation 1during the transfer of L, P, and PL from the liquid or solid phase to the gas phase,a nd during their ionization. Biosensoric techniques require the immobilization of either L or Ponto asensor surface,that also affects binding and, thus, the accuracy of the K d measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Isothermal titration calorimetry does not require labeling or immobilization but has another source of inaccuracy: the heat of side reactions (e.g.,b inding of Lt oh igh-concentration impurities in P, binding of PtoP ,and solvation of protons released upon Ls binding to P). [6] An inherent source of inaccuracyinK d values determined by direct mass-spectrometry (MS) is ashift of the equilibrium in Equation 1during the transfer of L, P, and PL from the liquid or solid phase to the gas phase,a nd during their ionization. [7] TheaccuracyofK d determination with sizeexclusion chromatography is affected by inevitable adsorption of L, P, and PL onto the stationary phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that loss of function due to the refolding procedure, incomplete ligand removal or sample aggregation during titration experiments contributed to a decrease in the final calculated N values. However, all binding curves with native or refolded protein could be fit using one‐site binding equations and low N values should not adversely affect the affinity constants reported here …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%