2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of protein binding on receptor occupancy: A two-compartment model

Abstract: In this paper we analyse the impact of protein-and lipid-and receptor-binding on receptor occupancy in a two-compartment system, with proteins in both compartments and lipids and receptors in the peripheral compartment only. We do this for two manners of drug administration: a bolus administration and a constant rate infusion, both into the central compartment. We derive explicit approximations for the timecurves of the different compounds valid for a wide range of realistic values of rate constants and initia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In analysing these models subject to the conditions ( 46 – 49 ) listed in Methods, a mathematical framework has been created which can be used to analyse comparable models, which involve additional processes such as (i) leakage, or (ii) binding of the ligand to proteins, lipids and receptors in the central or the peripheral compartment, such as discussed in [ 9 ], or (iii) when the model involves additional compartments. This analytical machinery makes it possible to give quantitative estimates of the impact of these processes on the drug distribution between compartments and over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analysing these models subject to the conditions ( 46 – 49 ) listed in Methods, a mathematical framework has been created which can be used to analyse comparable models, which involve additional processes such as (i) leakage, or (ii) binding of the ligand to proteins, lipids and receptors in the central or the peripheral compartment, such as discussed in [ 9 ], or (iii) when the model involves additional compartments. This analytical machinery makes it possible to give quantitative estimates of the impact of these processes on the drug distribution between compartments and over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, after a brief initial period, x ( τ ) and z ( τ ) are to good approximation related by the equation i.e., x and z are in quasi - equilibrium or quasi - steady state . For more details of this “quasi-steady state approximation” we refer to [6, 7, 19, 20]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such reduced models yield dynamic properties that are very similar to those of completely mechanistic models but require the identification of fewer parameters. They also yield important insights into the impact of different parameters on the full system and often explicit expressions and quantitative estimates for drug-, system-, and/or disease-specific characteristics, such as clearance or the area under the curve of different compounds [6, 7]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The concentration profile of the free drug in plasma and at the target site (pharmacokinetics, rebinding) [26,100]  Non-specific binding in plasma and target tissue [101]  The concentration of the target [26]  Competition between drug and endogenous ligand binding [14,15]  Target turnover [23], [102]  Signal transduction [103] These factors can all influence the ultimate importance of drug-target binding kinetics, thus putting the binding kinetics in the in vivo context. Therefore, these factors need to be taken into account in the translation from in vitro to in vivo target binding [104].…”
Section: Translating In Vitro To In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%