2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01707-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of radiation dose on patient-reported acute taste alteration in a prospective observational study cohort in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC)

Ilaria Morelli,
Isacco Desideri,
Andrea Romei
et al.

Abstract: Purpose Taste alteration (TA) is a frequent acute side effect of radiation treatment in HNSCC patients. Principal aim of our study was to investigate dosimetric parameters in relation to patient-assessed taste impairment in a prospective cohort treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Methods All patients with locally advanced HNSCC and amenable to radical treatment were included. Chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale (CITAS), EORTC QLQ-C30 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our analysis delved deeper into the significance of symptoms by conducting Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis for the time points immediately after the completion of treatment and the one 3 months after it ( Table 1 and Table 2 respectively). We found moderate statistical significance between certain symptoms (such as pain, swallowing difficulty, and dry mouth) and dosimetric data at the Organs at Risk (OARs) similarly to other research teams [ 24 , 25 ]. Conversely, symptoms like appetite loss, sticky mouth, and sensory problems showed low statistical correlation with dosimetric data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our analysis delved deeper into the significance of symptoms by conducting Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis for the time points immediately after the completion of treatment and the one 3 months after it ( Table 1 and Table 2 respectively). We found moderate statistical significance between certain symptoms (such as pain, swallowing difficulty, and dry mouth) and dosimetric data at the Organs at Risk (OARs) similarly to other research teams [ 24 , 25 ]. Conversely, symptoms like appetite loss, sticky mouth, and sensory problems showed low statistical correlation with dosimetric data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The sample size during participant recruitment indeed constitutes a factor that could affect the generalizability of the results and thus is a major concern in the majority of studies focusing on clinical regimes. While similar numbers of patients have been previously employed in analogous studies [ 24 , 34 ], the possibility of enlarging the sample size in future research endeavors is under consideration. Additionally, the fact that QoL questionnaires are relying on self-reported data introduces the possibility of bias in symptoms severity on behalf of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting review [ 72 ] indicates that olfactory perception of foods among head-and-neck-cancer patients is more frequent than changes in taste perception, as are changes in texture, temperature, and other oral sensations, such as hotness and cold. In these patients, smell is less affected by RT than taste, and can recover within 6 to 9 months after RT [ 73 ]. Another aspect of TSA is related to paraneoplastic syndrome, which includes tumor-induced alterations in the production of hormones, growth factors, and antigen–antibody complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed nausea may be significantly influenced by the occurrence of dysgeusia. In this regard, some authors have investigated the use of chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale (CiTAS) to prospectively evaluate this adverse event [ 39 ]. Of note, a recovery for discomfort, phantogeusia–parageusia and general taste impairment at 6 months was observed by Martini and colleagues [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%