Impact of readiness assurance process and faculty feedback on individual application exercises: a model for continuous assessment in physiology

Abstract

This study is aimed at the implementation of a continuous assessment model in physiology for a large-enrollment classroom with 250 students. The readiness assurance process (RAP) and immediate feedback elements from team-based learning (TBL) methodology were adopted to test their ability to guide students to solve applications exercises individually. Three continuous assessments in physiology (CAPs) were conducted with the RAP to include individual (iRAT) and group readiness assurance tests (gRAT). Immediate feedback was provided with faculty-student discussion (FSD), and the individual application exercises (iAE) were designed to be answered individually. Each CAP was subjected to three types of experimental manipulation in subgroups created out of 250 students. The intervention began with iRAT for all three subgroups. The sequence of iRAT, gRAT, FSD, and iAE varied between subgroups within a CAP. In a cross-over study design, each subgroup of students was subjected to all three intervention types over three CAPs. The subgroup completing iAE after RAP and FSD showed higher scores than the subgroup with RAP alone. One hundred eight-two students (82.35% response rate; 101 women and 81 men) responded to the questionnaire. The majority of students (87.4%) felt that doing iRAT and gRAT at the beginning helped them to solve iAE better. Most of the students (86.8%) responded that they received useful feedback and clarification during the discussion with the teacher after the gRAT. In conclusion, the administration of iRAT first followed by gRAT and immediate feedback from faculty seem to be beneficial to prepare students to tackle application-based exercises.

Acceptance of team-based learning by students and faculty: A pilot study

“…22 Graduate students appreciated an active and participatory learning environment during classroom activities in particular the RATs application exercises and timely feedback which corroborates with literature. 23 They highlighted importance of RAT Rehana Rehman et al…”

Continuous Online Assessment at a South African Open Distance and e-Learning Institution

“…Students find feedback as effective when it is provided during the teaching process than once at the end of the semester (Pereira et al, 2016;Alique and Linares, 2019). When feedback is provided during the teaching process, either by instructors or peers, it provides students with alternate views and helps with developing new mental constructs of understanding (Nayak et al, 2020).…”

“…CA helps reduce the negative effects of highstakes once-off examinations (rote memorization, cramming, and high anxiety) and helps to promote student learning (De Lisle, 2015;Holmes, 2018). The application of CA in higher education spans different disciplines (Rezigalla et al, 2017;Day et al, 2018c;Nayak et al, 2020;Zhan, 2020) and various pedagogic approaches (Day et al, 2018b;Llamas-Nistal et al, 2019;Chong et al, 2020). CA has also been shown to work in traditional contexts as well as through using online and interactive Information and Communications Technology (ICT) systems (González-Campos et al, 2018).…”