2020
DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogaa040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Rebel Group Ideology on Wartime Sexual Violence

Abstract: Does rebel group ideology influence variation in wartime sexual violence? While existing studies have explored country-level and conflict-specific factors to explain wartime sexual violence, it is important to recognize that rebels vary in their characteristics and sexual violence behavior. Specifically, rebel groups differ in their values regarding gender equality. I argue that the ideological preferences held by rebels and their foreign supporters can influence sexual violence during armed conflict. Particul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nuestra teoría se basa en trabajos recientes que han explorado cómo la ideología de una organización, en mayor o menor medida, prescribe y legitima su patrón de violencia contra civiles, en particular la violencia sexual. En el caso de la victimización de civiles por parte de organizaciones no estatales, muchas teorías -incluidas las centradas en la dotación de recursos, el oportunismo en tiempos de guerra, la cultura patriarcal, el reclutamiento forzado y la masculinidad militarizada-predicen que la ideología de grupo tiene poco efecto (Sarwari, 2020). Sin embargo, los académicos enfatizan cada vez más que la ideología puede ser un determinante importante de la presencia o ausencia de violencia sexual en tiempos de guerra.…”
Section: Nuestra Teoríaunclassified
“…Nuestra teoría se basa en trabajos recientes que han explorado cómo la ideología de una organización, en mayor o menor medida, prescribe y legitima su patrón de violencia contra civiles, en particular la violencia sexual. En el caso de la victimización de civiles por parte de organizaciones no estatales, muchas teorías -incluidas las centradas en la dotación de recursos, el oportunismo en tiempos de guerra, la cultura patriarcal, el reclutamiento forzado y la masculinidad militarizada-predicen que la ideología de grupo tiene poco efecto (Sarwari, 2020). Sin embargo, los académicos enfatizan cada vez más que la ideología puede ser un determinante importante de la presencia o ausencia de violencia sexual en tiempos de guerra.…”
Section: Nuestra Teoríaunclassified
“…Some groups have ideologies that are more likely to produce violence. For instance, Sarwari (2021) shows that religious insurgents are much more likely to encourage sexual violence as a means of subjugation, whereas Marxist-Leninist groups are less likely to do so. Sanı´n and Wood (2014) argue that ideology conditions violence as a means of socialization or in reducing normative commitments to restrain from using violence.…”
Section: Pathways To Civilian Victimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, in leveraging past research on ideology, bargaining, and natural resources (e.g., Wood, 2014; Wood & Kathman, 2014) alongside qualitative evidence from Cabo Delgado, we can suggest explanations for why the insurgents in Cabo Delgado behave in a seemingly self-defeating way and—broadly— when environmental shocks can increase civilian risk. In our theoretical section, we outline several potential explanations for this behavior, building on past research on social (dis)embeddeness (Mampilly & Stewart, 2021; Moore, 2019), ideological extremism (Sarwari, 2021; Thaler, 2012), and signaling (Farrell, 2020). Our qualitative assessment provides some evidence in support of these explanations within Cabo Delgado’s insurgency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A question arises about how to define ideology in the context of this study on DP. One approach is to rely on categories that depict the groups’ political doctrines, such as left-wing, right-wing, anti-government, ethnonationalist, Islamist and/or other religious types (Polo and Gleditsch, 2016; Wood and Thomas, 2017; Sarwari, 2021; Asal et al , 2021). These categories are useful for capturing political incompatibility with the incumbent government’s official policies.…”
Section: Ideological Appeals and Durable Peacementioning
confidence: 99%