2011
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of regulated releases on periphyton and macroinvertebrate communities: The dynamic relationship between hydrology and geomorphology in frequently flooded rivers.

Abstract: Flood-type disturbances affect both periphyton and macroinvertebrate communities depending on their frequency, magnitude and duration, but some impacts can be mitigated by geomorphic constraints. We studied four rivers in the Adirondack Mountains; the Indian River experienced regulated flow releases creating bank-full floods four times/week whereas other study sites provided a continuum of control conditions for comparison. We sampled periphyton and macroinvertebrate communities in each river along with channe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the situation in the Bævra and Lundesokna, increasing invertebrate densities with increasing distance from shore downstream plants of hydropeaking rivers have also been recorded by others (Fisher & LaVoy, ; Troelstrup & Hergenrader, 1990; Jones, ). In agreement with our findings, Fuller et al () recorded higher invertebrate densities in high shear stress areas than low shear stress areas and argued that ecological impacts may be mitigated by geomorphic constraints. They found that the substrate in the high shear stress area was immobile and channel experienced no adjustments in spite of high flood frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the situation in the Bævra and Lundesokna, increasing invertebrate densities with increasing distance from shore downstream plants of hydropeaking rivers have also been recorded by others (Fisher & LaVoy, ; Troelstrup & Hergenrader, 1990; Jones, ). In agreement with our findings, Fuller et al () recorded higher invertebrate densities in high shear stress areas than low shear stress areas and argued that ecological impacts may be mitigated by geomorphic constraints. They found that the substrate in the high shear stress area was immobile and channel experienced no adjustments in spite of high flood frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In both rivers, gatherers/collectors were the dominating functional feeding group in the ramping zone. This is in agreement with Fuller et al (), but they also found that grazers dominated low shear stress areas. Troelstrup and Hergenrader () found that gatherers/collectors together with predators were the predominating FF‐groups in areas subjected to diel flow fluctuations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Places with low streamflow variability and without flood pulses changing the available habitat can maintain a higher concentration of resources, especially organic matter and plant material, which are easily consumed (Piana et al 2006). Diet diversity was constant in the nonregulated river but significantly decreased during spring in the regulated one, which can be explained by the absence of natural spring high flows, which reduces the effect that substrate scour has on invertebrate diversity, while facilitating detritus accumulation (Fuller et al 2011), contributing to a reduction in barbel dietary breadth. Within the southern system, the regulated river presented a higher abundance of macrophytes and invertebrates in the environment, which may result from the hypolimnetic discharge by the upstream dam in the end of spring, which is usually eutrophic, deoxygenated and of bad quality, benefiting plant growth and affecting less tolerant animal species, reducing, for example, invertebrate diversity and increasing the abundance of taxa adapted to harsh environments (Brittain & Saltveit 1989;Cortes et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diet diversity was constant in the nonregulated river but significantly decreased during spring in the regulated one, which can be explained by the absence of natural spring high flows, which reduces the effect that substrate scour has on invertebrate diversity, while facilitating detritus accumulation (Fuller et al. ), contributing to a reduction in barbel dietary breadth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sites associated to free-flowing rivers a lower biomass would be associated to the influence of floods, frequent water level fluctuations and higher turbidity (Uehlinger et al, 2003;Fuller et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%