2021
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of rehabilitation start time on functional outcomes after stroke

Abstract: This study examined the effect on functional outcomes of the time after stroke of starting rehabilitation. A large national database was searched for eligible stroke patients, resulting in a total of 140,655 patients from 1,161 hospitals. Starting rehabilitation on the day of admission or second day of hospitalization after stroke was found to be associated with better functional outcomes at dis charge than starting rehabilitation on the third day or later. For patients with haemorrhagic stroke, those who star… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study mainly included patients with cerebral infarction, and the remaining patients had hemorrhage. This distribution was similar to that in previous retrospective studies on rehabilitation for stroke (18) , (19) , (33) , (34) . Nevertheless, the mean age of the patients was higher in the current study compared with those of the previous studies, presumably because of the nature of the current database; that is, the database included almost all residents aged 65 years or older but did not include residents aged 40-64 years who joined the employee’s insurance (insurance other than the National Health Insurance).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The current study mainly included patients with cerebral infarction, and the remaining patients had hemorrhage. This distribution was similar to that in previous retrospective studies on rehabilitation for stroke (18) , (19) , (33) , (34) . Nevertheless, the mean age of the patients was higher in the current study compared with those of the previous studies, presumably because of the nature of the current database; that is, the database included almost all residents aged 65 years or older but did not include residents aged 40-64 years who joined the employee’s insurance (insurance other than the National Health Insurance).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Anticoagulation was the only treatment for the aetiology of ischaemic stroke in the absence of thrombolysis, in accordance with the work of Mohammad Mehdi [25]. Early physiotherapy was used less frequently, in disagreement with the results of Sonfo and Satoshi Otokita [15,26]. Half the patients had sequelae on discharge, as Ramon Luengo-Fernandez had observed [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…When stroke rehabilitation was added as "AND" condition to the identification algorithm, the sensitivity decreased to approximately 30%, and the PPV was >0.8. Early rehabilitation has been demonstrated to improve physical functioning impaired by ischemic stroke, 17,27 and a previous validation study reported that the probability of being a true AIS is particularly high in cases transferred from a neurology department to a rehabilitation department. 28 Therefore, we consider that the information on rehabilitation effectively identifies patients with AIS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shima et al 15 also reported that the positive predictive values (PPVs) for outcome identification algorithms were increased when event-specific treatment data for ischemic stroke were added to the algorithm based on diagnostic codes alone. However, there is few evidence regarding the validity of identification algorithms consisting of ICD-10 diagnostic codes in combination with other measures for hospitalized patients with AIS 16,17 in administrative databases, such as diagnostic imaging, drug administration, mechanical thrombectomy, or rehabilitation. In the present study, we assessed the validity of identification algorithms consisting of several combinations of ICD-10 diagnostic codes and other measures for inpatients with AIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%