2019
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/ab3593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of relativity on particle localizability and ground state entanglement

Abstract: Can a relativistic quantum field theory be consistently described as a theory of localizable particles? There are many known issues with such a description, indicating an answer in the negative. In this paper, we examine these obstructions by tracing how they (partially) subside in passing to an approximation of ordinary quantum mechanics in the non-relativistic regime. We undertake a recovery of the characteristic features of non-relativistic quantum mechanics beyond simply the Schrödinger equation. We find t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Here, we shall now also address Kuchař's first criticism (a) on relativistic localization, which is more subtle to resolve. The main reason, as is well-known from the theorems of Perez-Wilde [92] and Malament [93] (see also the discussion in [94,95]), is that there is no relativistically covariant positionoperator-based notion of localization which is compatible with relativistic causality and positivity of energy. This is a key motivation for quantum field theory [90,94]-and here a challenge for specifying what the "right" localization probability for a relativistic particle should be.…”
Section: Relativistic Localization: Addressing Kuchař's Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Here, we shall now also address Kuchař's first criticism (a) on relativistic localization, which is more subtle to resolve. The main reason, as is well-known from the theorems of Perez-Wilde [92] and Malament [93] (see also the discussion in [94,95]), is that there is no relativistically covariant positionoperator-based notion of localization which is compatible with relativistic causality and positivity of energy. This is a key motivation for quantum field theory [90,94]-and here a challenge for specifying what the "right" localization probability for a relativistic particle should be.…”
Section: Relativistic Localization: Addressing Kuchař's Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that when conditioning on this covariant clock POVM rather than Minkowski time, one obtains a Newton-Wigner type localization probability [90,91]. While a Newton-Wigner type localization is approximate and not fully Lorentz covariant, due to the relativistic localization nogo theorems of Perez-Wilde [92] and Malament [93] (see also [94,95]), it is generally accepted as the best possible localization in relativistic quantum mechanics (In quantum field theory localization is a different matter [90,94]). This demonstrates the advantage of using covariant clock POVMs in relational quantum dynamics [7,44,45,96,97].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a clear notion of localized particles is required, in our scenario, to ascribe different proper times to the two particles. Defining this notion clearly in quantum field theory has proved a challenge in itself [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] due to a range of issues, from relativistic considerations to the measurement problem. Second, the theory is predominantly used to calculate amplitudes for transitions from an initial state defined at t → −∞ to different final states defined at t → +∞.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an expression of the fact that there are no position operators in relativistic quantum field theory. For a recent detailed investigation of this and related phenomena, see [78]. However, in the nonrelativistic regime, where the rest mass of the UDW detector dominates over the occurring momenta, ω D p,a is approximately constant.…”
Section: Recovering a Prior Model In The First Quantized Nonrelativis...mentioning
confidence: 99%