2018
DOI: 10.3126/el.v13i0.19148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Remittance on Household Income, Consumption and Poverty Reduction of Nepal

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Masron and Wari (2018) interpreted that remittances reduce poverty by increasing household income of the poor and utilising remittances in more productive activities. Similar findings have been found by Bam et al (2016) that there is an inverse relationship between remittance and poverty headcount ratio and poverty gap. Remittances from abroad are found to have a statistically significant and positive impact on poverty alleviation only for upper middle-income countries (Azam et al (2016) while Simiyu et al (2018) found that there were significant welfare and poverty level differences between remittance recipient and non-recipient households.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Masron and Wari (2018) interpreted that remittances reduce poverty by increasing household income of the poor and utilising remittances in more productive activities. Similar findings have been found by Bam et al (2016) that there is an inverse relationship between remittance and poverty headcount ratio and poverty gap. Remittances from abroad are found to have a statistically significant and positive impact on poverty alleviation only for upper middle-income countries (Azam et al (2016) while Simiyu et al (2018) found that there were significant welfare and poverty level differences between remittance recipient and non-recipient households.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It can be inferred that remittances received by households are signi cantly associated with their expenditures verifying the rst hypothesis of the study. The result is in line with the ndings of Bam, et al (2016) who assessed the effect of remittances on households' expenditures in Nepal. The result is also related to the study of Mondal & Khanam (2018) who used panel data of 84 developing countries to assess both the short and long run impact of remittances on households' expenditures.…”
Section: Relationship Between Remittances and Households' Expendituressupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In sub-Saharan Africa, the remittances effect remains positive on poverty and even more on nancial development (Gupta et al, 2009). Speci cally, on households' expenditures, researchers have found remittances to increase household income and consumption (Bam et al, 2016). According to Castaldo & Reilly (2007), remittance-receiving households spend more on durable goods as compared to non-durable goods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tourism industry is one of the largest and fastest-growing industries worldwide (World Tourism Organization, 2017), with a significant contribution to poverty alleviation (Spenceley & Meyer, 2012) and economic development (Lee & Chang, 2008;Sinclair, 1998;Seetanah, 2011). The Nepalese economy is still based on migrant remittances (Bam et al, 2016), and it struggles to reduce poverty. Therefore, the growth of the tourism industry is beneficial (Gautam, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%