2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of renal insufficiency on long-term clinical outcome in patients with heart failure treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy

Abstract: The present study suggests that advanced renal insufficiency is quite useful for the prediction of worsening clinical outcomes in HF patients treated by CRT. Preservation of renal function by CRT brings about better cardiac survival through prevention of adverse cardiac events, even in HF patients with advanced renal insufficiency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we found that a positive GFR improvement, 6 months after CRT implant, is significantly associated with a lower hazard (for each 10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 of GFR improvement HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.99; p = 0.038). A similar result is also found by Hosoda et al [20] who demonstrated in 67 consecutive patients who underwent CRT that advanced renal insufficiency was an independent predictor of cardiac mortality combined with HF hospitalization (odds ratio 3.01, p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis in the baseline advanced renal insufficiency group revealed that patients with preserved renal function by CRT (< 10% reduction in estimated GFR) had a higher rate of decrease of LV end-systolic diameter (-14.0% vs. -0.8%, p = 0.023) and lower cardiac mortality combined with HF hospitalization (log-rank: p = 0.029) compared with patients with deterioration of renal function (≥ 10% reduction in estimated GFR).…”
Section: Renal Function Improvement After Crt and Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, we found that a positive GFR improvement, 6 months after CRT implant, is significantly associated with a lower hazard (for each 10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 of GFR improvement HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.99; p = 0.038). A similar result is also found by Hosoda et al [20] who demonstrated in 67 consecutive patients who underwent CRT that advanced renal insufficiency was an independent predictor of cardiac mortality combined with HF hospitalization (odds ratio 3.01, p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis in the baseline advanced renal insufficiency group revealed that patients with preserved renal function by CRT (< 10% reduction in estimated GFR) had a higher rate of decrease of LV end-systolic diameter (-14.0% vs. -0.8%, p = 0.023) and lower cardiac mortality combined with HF hospitalization (log-rank: p = 0.029) compared with patients with deterioration of renal function (≥ 10% reduction in estimated GFR).…”
Section: Renal Function Improvement After Crt and Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It has been estimated that as many as 25% to 50% of patients with HF have impaired renal function (creatinine clearance < 60-75 mL/ /min/1.73 m 2 ) [20][21][22]. Recently, a systematic review has examined the effects of CRT in CKD patients (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) with HF.…”
Section: Heart Failure Renal Function and Crtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CRT does not have a direct effect on the kidneys, CRT responders demonstrate a subsequent decrease in sympathetic and RAAS activation, thus conferring an improvement in hemodynamics, mean arterial pressure, and renal perfusion. These improvements have also been associated with better outcomes with CRT (27,32,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Forty-eight unique studies were selected for full-text review. Eighteen studies met all inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review: 14 observational studies and 4 RCTs (11,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39). To evaluate the effect on survival outcomes, studies were classified into the following two groups: (1) comparing outcomes in all CKD patients who had CRT versus those without CRT and (2) comparing post-CRT outcomes in patients with baseline CKD versus those without CKD.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation