2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-00983-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of renal replacement therapies on olfactory ability: results of a cross-sectional case control study

Abstract: Introduction Several studies have suggested that chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be associated with olfactory impairment. However, to date, the impact of renal replacement therapies has only been partly defined. Methods We tested the olfactory function of 235 participants [50 kidney transplant recipients (KT), 49 hemodialyzed patients (HD), 30 peritoneal dialysis patients (PD), 51 patients with CKD not on dialysis (ND-CKD) and 55 healthy subjects (HS)] by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All subjects initially received an MMSE [13] and a SNOT-22 [14], respectively, for cognitive status and sinonasal symptom evaluations. Patients with an MMSE score lower than 18, suggestive of possible severe cognitive deficit, or subjects with a SNOT-22 score higher than 22, indicative of possible sinonasal pathology, were excluded [15]. Other exclusion criteria were diabetes in therapy with insulin [16], hypothyroidism, tobacco smoking (current or in the last 5 years), history of allergic/non-allergic rhinitis or chronic rhinosinusitis, previous sinonasal surgery, history of head trauma or post-viral olfactory loss, and previous chemotherapy/radiotherapy to head and neck [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subjects initially received an MMSE [13] and a SNOT-22 [14], respectively, for cognitive status and sinonasal symptom evaluations. Patients with an MMSE score lower than 18, suggestive of possible severe cognitive deficit, or subjects with a SNOT-22 score higher than 22, indicative of possible sinonasal pathology, were excluded [15]. Other exclusion criteria were diabetes in therapy with insulin [16], hypothyroidism, tobacco smoking (current or in the last 5 years), history of allergic/non-allergic rhinitis or chronic rhinosinusitis, previous sinonasal surgery, history of head trauma or post-viral olfactory loss, and previous chemotherapy/radiotherapy to head and neck [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human olfaction involves complex processes that detect, discriminate, and code thousands of odors ( McGann, 2017 ). Olfactory impairments reflect deficient functionality in the periphery with variable odor thresholds or compromised central processing of the olfactory information resulting in diminished odor discrimination and identification ( Frasnelli et al, 2002 ; Raff et al, 2008 ; Robles-Osorio et al, 2020 ; Iacono et al, 2021 ; Yusuf et al, 2021a ).…”
Section: Olfactory Function In Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recovery probably explains the discrepancies observed in odor threshold deficiencies, which improve after dialysis treatment ( Landis et al, 2011 ). The complete recovery of odor discrimination and identification after renal transplantation is due to the decreased generalized inflammation that allows for sufficient neuronal information processing ( Vreman et al, 1980 ; Griep et al, 1997 ; Frasnelli et al, 2002 ; Landis et al, 2011 ; Koseoglu et al, 2017 ; Iacono et al, 2021 ; Yusuf et al, 2021a ). Interestingly, odor stimulation contributes to the recovery of OB atrophy ( Hasegawa-Ishii et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Olfactory Function In Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations