Impact of Resin Content on Swelling Pressure of Three Layer Perticleboard Bonded with Urea-Formaldehyde Adhesive

Medved, Sergej; Antonović, Alan; Jambreković, Vladimir

doi:10.5552/drind.2011.1025

Cited by 14 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Fenghu & Fangtian (1997) sta zmanjšanje trdnosti pripisala hidrolizi lepila in napetostim, ki nastanejo kot posledica nabrekanja. Napetosti ob nabrekanju so opazili tudi Tarkov & Turner (1958), Niemz & Steinmetzler (1992), Medved et al (2011). Namen študije je bil ugotoviti stopnjo spremembe tlačnega striga oz.…”

Section: Summary Povzetekunclassified

“…The degradation and failure of the adhesive bond was the main reason for the increase in creep at PB and MDF, as determined by Zhou et al (2001). The occurrence of swelling stresses was also determined by Tarkov & Turner (1958), Niemz & Steinmetzler (1992), Medved et al (2011). Wu & Piao (1999) researched the internal bond strength loss at OSB when exposed to different climate conditions and immersed into water.…”

mentioning

confidence: 95%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The dynamics of thickness swelling and bond strength loss of different wood-based panels at exposure to humid climate and immersion into water

Medved¹,

Žgajner²,

Antonović³

2019

les-wood

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IzvlečekAbstract: An important aspect of wood-based panel usability, especially for construction, load bearing purposes or when in use for longer time, is its resistance against water. The resistance against water is related to type of woodbased panel, morphological characteristics of the constituents that panel is made of, and from the resin that was used for bonding. In an experiment we used four different wood-based panels, namely MDF (urea-formaldehyde adhesive), particleboard (urea-formaldehyde adhesive), OSB (melamine-urea-formaldehyde adhesive) and beech plywood (melamine-urea-formaldehyde adhesive). All panels were immersed into water and exposed to a humid climate for 90 days. Thickness swelling, compression shear strength and shear strength were determined after 1, 5, 30 and 90 days. The results showed that the highest strength decrease was observed at immersion into water. The lowest compression shear strength after immersion into water and exposure to a humid climate was determined for MDF. The occurrence of constituent failure due to mexposure to water was demonstrated through SEM analysis.Izvleček: Pomemben dejavnik uporabnosti lesnih ploščnih kompozitov pri gradnji in nosilnih konstrukcijah je odpornost le-teh proti delovanju vode. Odpornost proti delovanju vode je odvisna od vrste lesnega ploščnega kompozita, morfoloških lastnosti gradnika, iz katerega je plošča narejena, in lepila, uporabljenega za lepljenje. Za izvedbo raziskave smo uporabili štiri različne lesne ploščne kompozite in sicer MDF (urea-formaldehidno lepilo), iverno ploščo (urea-formaldehidno lepilo), OSB (melamin-urea-formaldehidno lepilo) in bukovo furnirno ploščo (melamin-urea-formaldehidno lepilo). Vse plošče so bile potopljene v vodo in izpostavljene vlažnim klimatskim pogojem. Določili smo debelinski nabrek, tlačni strig in strižno trdnost. Lastnosti so bile določene 1, 5, 30 in 90 dni po izpostavitvi. Največja sprememba trdnosti je bila ugotovljena pri preskušancih, potopljenih v vodo. Najnižja odpornost proti delovanju vode je bila ugotovljena pri MDF plošči. S SEM slikovno analizo smo prikazali nastanek razpok in porušitve zgradbe gradnikov.

show abstract

Section: Summary Povzetekunclassified

mentioning

confidence: 95%

The dynamics of thickness swelling and bond strength loss of different wood-based panels at exposure to humid climate and immersion into water

Medved¹,

Žgajner²,

Antonović³

2019

les-wood

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The MC values were calculate by looking to the weight (specimens) before and after process. It was use the drying oven at 24 hours for 80°C [4] for the second time. The MC value was determined by using formula given in equation 4:…”

Section: Fig 2 Particleboard Specimens D Physical Testing Particlebmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical Properties of Homogeneous Particleboard based on Acacia Tree and Polyurethane Adhesive as a Resins

Baharuddin*¹,

Zain²,

Roslin³

et al. 2019

IJEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The formaldehyde-based adhesives have always been chosen for manufacturer in the making of particleboard because of the cost. However, it has low moisture resistance and high water absorption. At the same time, formaldehyde-based adhesive also produced gaseous emission that can cause cancer and bronchial health. Meanwhile, the high water resistance, low moisture content and healthy to the human body nowadays becomes most important issues in the making of furniture for market. This research was discusses on the ability of Acacia tree as raw material and polyurethane (PU) as an adhesive for making the homogeneous particleboard. The aim of this research is to looking the impact of using different particle sizes from Acacia tree to the physical properties of the end product. This study also focuses on the potential of paraffin wax as a water repellent agent. The testing of physical properties was includes the thickness swelling (TS) testing, moisture content (MC), density and water absorption (WA testing). The size of Acacia particle was varied from x<2mm, 4mm>x>2mm and x>4mm. All particleboards produced was achieve the range of medium density according to the Japan Industry Standard (JIS). The results have shown that the value of the density and the particle size was influenced the result especially for the physical properties. From this research it is proved that the PU as a resin and sawdust of acacia tree with some specific size can be a good binder and material for the particle board industries in future. The paraffin wax also showed a great potential as a water repellent agent based on the reduction of water absorption of the particleboard. The particleboard with sizes between 2mm to 4mm proves better results compared to the smaller or bigger sizes of particle.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the particleboard could swell when used in high moisture area, leading to microbial attack and a decrease in dimensional stability. Therefore, particleboard is suitable mainly for indoor furnitures which should avoid moisture areas to get better dimensional stability . Based on the wood particle size, the core layer contains lots of voids between the coarse wood particles as compared to the surface layer which might affect thickness swelling and water absorption of particleboard .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Polyethylene on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Particleboard

Waelaeh

Tanrattanakul

Phunyarat³

et al. 2017

Macromolecular Symposia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Particleboard is a common material used in furniture manufacturing. In the present study, it is made from natural rubber wood in the form of coarse and fine particles which is glued with urea formaldehyde adhesive. Because of the cellulosic structure containing many hydroxyl groups, the particleboard becomes a hygroscopic product. The objective of the present study was to increase the water resistance of the particleboard by adding polyethylene (PE). Four grades of PE were selected and mixed with the rubber wood particles before forming as a three‐layer particleboard. Water absorption and thickness swelling were determined. The mechanical properties of the particleboard were evaluated including modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of elasticity (MOE), internal bond strength (IB) and screw holding force. It is found that the addition of 5 wt% PE decreased the thickness swelling at 2 h, e.g. from 19.27% to 13.18–17.16%, and at 24 h, e.g. from 23.81% to 16.88–21.04%. The presence of 5 wt% PE also decreased the water absorption at 2 h, e.g. from 56.17% to 42.01–52.98%, and at 24 h, e.g. from 70.89% to 58.63–66.76%. LDPE D209 and LDPE 2420T showed high potential in this application because they enhanced the water resistance and slightly increased the internal bond strength of the particleboard. MOR and MOE of particleboard could be ranked in the following order: D209 > control > 2420T.

show abstract

Impact of Resin Content on Swelling Pressure of Three Layer Perticleboard Bonded with Urea-Formaldehyde Adhesive

Cited by 14 publications

References 1 publication

The dynamics of thickness swelling and bond strength loss of different wood-based panels at exposure to humid climate and immersion into water

The dynamics of thickness swelling and bond strength loss of different wood-based panels at exposure to humid climate and immersion into water

Physical Properties of Homogeneous Particleboard based on Acacia Tree and Polyurethane Adhesive as a Resins

Effect of Polyethylene on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Particleboard

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About