2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of rituximab on humoral response to COVID-19 booster vaccine and antibody kinetics in patients with anti–neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, patients treated with rituximab had particularly low seroconversion rates6 7 without detectable neutralising antibody activity against B.1.617.2 in our study. In a first case series on a third vaccine dose in three patients with AAV treated with rituximab, the booster dose was only associated with detectable humoral response in one patient 8. In our study, no patient treated with rituximab in the last year showed neutralising activity against B.1.617.2 after a third vaccine dose.…”
contrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, patients treated with rituximab had particularly low seroconversion rates6 7 without detectable neutralising antibody activity against B.1.617.2 in our study. In a first case series on a third vaccine dose in three patients with AAV treated with rituximab, the booster dose was only associated with detectable humoral response in one patient 8. In our study, no patient treated with rituximab in the last year showed neutralising activity against B.1.617.2 after a third vaccine dose.…”
contrasting
confidence: 40%
“…In a first case series on a third vaccine dose in three patients with AAV treated with rituximab, the booster dose was only associated with detectable humoral response in one patient. 8 In our study, no patient treated with rituximab in the last year showed neutralising activity against B.1.617.2 after a third vaccine dose. However, in patients with AAV not treated with rituximab, a third mRNA vaccine dose resulted in significantly higher B.1.617.2 neutralisation compared with standard two-dose mRNA vaccination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 45%
“… 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 28 articles were excluded with the following reasons: (1) insufficient data of outcomes, 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 (2) duplicate publications from an overlapping cohort, 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 and (3) case series or cohorts with < 10 patients. 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 A flow diagram of the article selection process is shown in Figure 1 , and the characteristics of each study are summarized in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Additionally, some patients with advanced chronic kidney disease or end stage kidney disease are maintained on medications, such as mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, which demonstrably reduced responsiveness to the COVID‐19 vaccine, and may require several vaccine doses to elicit clinically significant responsiveness (however defined). 22 , 23 No policy can be sufficiently granular to account for all clinical scenarios, but precision and specificity provides greater support to a center's arguments in favor of endorsing a requirement under the rubric of safe clinical practice. While is it probable that a hypo‐responsive vaccine recipient has more protection against severe COVID‐19 infection compared to no vaccination due to elicited T‐cell mediated immunity, centers with a vaccine mandate should specify whether the mandate requires that transplant candidates demonstrate threshold antibody titers (or some other validated surrogate measure of responsiveness) after vaccination, before deemed eligible to receive an organ offer.…”
Section: Vaccine Refusal Shared Decision‐making and Consent To Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there have been concerns raised regarding the reliability of clinical interpretations of both the presence and absence of post‐vaccine antibodies, as well as antibody titers 21 . Additionally, some patients with advanced chronic kidney disease or end stage kidney disease are maintained on medications, such as mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, which demonstrably reduced responsiveness to the COVID‐19 vaccine, and may require several vaccine doses to elicit clinically significant responsiveness (however defined) 22,23 . No policy can be sufficiently granular to account for all clinical scenarios, but precision and specificity provides greater support to a center's arguments in favor of endorsing a requirement under the rubric of safe clinical practice.…”
Section: Vaccine Refusal Shared Decision‐making and Consent To Immuno...mentioning
confidence: 99%