Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3029798.3038373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Robot Initiative on Human-Robot Collaboration

Abstract: This paper presents a study on the impact of autonomy in the context of human-robot collaboration. We consider two conditions: i) a semi-autonomous robot that decides when to execute a supporting action, and ii) a support robot that has to be instructed of each action on a collaborative task. The semi-autonomous robot gradually learns how to support the human through experience. We found that users prefer the semi-autonomous robot and that the behavior was closer to their expectations despite them being more a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies investigating workers' perception of allocation processes in a collaborative context are quite rare. Munzer et al (2017) find that a self-learning, autonomous and initiatively task-executing robot is perceived as more helpful and is preferred in collaboration. Castro et al (2017) compare a human-led and a robot-led experimental setting in which humans and robots have to execute a task based on the division of labor.…”
Section: Influence On the Allocation Decisionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies investigating workers' perception of allocation processes in a collaborative context are quite rare. Munzer et al (2017) find that a self-learning, autonomous and initiatively task-executing robot is perceived as more helpful and is preferred in collaboration. Castro et al (2017) compare a human-led and a robot-led experimental setting in which humans and robots have to execute a task based on the division of labor.…”
Section: Influence On the Allocation Decisionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The question evolving is whether people are actually more pleased with the allocation process itself compared to making their own decision. Or is it just the higher productivity (Gombolay et al, 2015) and fluency of processes (Munzer et al, 2017) resulting from automation-generated planning that makes them more satisfied? An indication for this could be the findings of Cummings and Bruni (2010): They show how people even try to participate in a resource allocation task that can be highly automated, choosing a manual adaptation of automated decisions or comparing an automated to a manual solution instead of relying on the system.…”
Section: Influence On the Allocation Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also shows that people prefer a cooperating system as a team partner and feeling more important to the task in a shared decision (Gombolay et al 2015). Munzer et al (2017) show that users prefer a robot that acts semi-autonomously and initiates actions on its own compared to one that needs to be assigned each task manually. The reasons for these findings require further research.…”
Section: Task Allocation In Human-robot Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positioning and movement are a known interaction and communication vector in Human-Human relationships [6]. Various other vectors have received attention from the HRI field as seen in works studying gaze [14], intention [15], engagement [16], robot initiative [17], reaction time to touch stimuli [18]. In comparison, few works study the effect of varying the dimensions controlled by navigation algorithms on a robot's interaction with surrounding humans.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%