2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of robotic 3D printing process parameters on interlayer bond strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finished composite's mechanical integrity and quality are determined by many critical factors in the 3-D printing process. Among the most difficult parameters to optimize are [19,20].…”
Section: Optimizing 3-d Printing Process Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finished composite's mechanical integrity and quality are determined by many critical factors in the 3-D printing process. Among the most difficult parameters to optimize are [19,20].…”
Section: Optimizing 3-d Printing Process Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of contours and print speed are shown to be the most significant determinants of the final component of the FDM process's quality [18]. Regularly altering the nozzle's standoff distance can improve the interlayer bond strength under shear by an average of 41% https://doi.org/10.31881/TLR.2024.076 [19]. Tensile strength is mostly determined by changes in infill density [40].…”
Section: Influence Of 3-d Printing Parameters On Mechanical Integrity...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For current printing inks, the corresponding printed samples have low molding accuracy, high firing shrinkage, and low strength, limiting the application scope of this technology in the porcelain field. , However, for the high solid loading paste suitable for manufacturing porcelain, it is a complex and challenging issue to design the porcelain clay paste with an appropriate rheology threshold before printing, avoiding the occurrence of clogs and slumping during printing and retaining its shape after printing . For this issue, some scholars have reported relative findings, such as clay formulation, modifier type and content, surface modification, printing parameters, and solids volume fraction, which are controlled to improve the rheological behavior of the precursor, achieve good printability and physical properties, and prepare high-precision 3D printing samples. Faksawat et al used 3D printing technology to prepare specific bone production with a bending strength below 40 MPa and a volume shrinkage of about 27% at a sintering temperature of 1200 °C, when 95 wt % clay and 5 wt % hydroxyapatite were selected as raw materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings suggest that prolonging the time interval between two layers leads to a reduction in bonding strength, while increasing the nozzle distance has only a limited effect on it. Mehdi’s group [ 29 ] investigated the influence of three process parameters (distance between nodes on the printing path, nozzle-to-substrate distance, and delay time) on the interlayer bonding strength of clay-based materials produced via additive manufacturing. Their study revealed that the periodic manipulation of the nozzle distance functions similarly to compaction in traditional concrete pouring techniques, resulting in a 41% increase in the average interlayer bonding strength under shear stress, ultimately enhancing the quality of the printing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%