Impact of screw retained versus cement retained implant-supported prosthesis on peri-implantitis:A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abdullah, Adnan; Al-Fahd, Naji; Alsourori, Ail; Al-Qutabi, Ahmed Yaseen; Farouk, Mohamed; Abbas, Nadia A.

doi:10.15713/ins.idmjar.32

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, our findings are comparable to studies in the Asian context, which reported awareness levels in the range of 41.7 to 47%. [6][7][8]10,13,14 In this study, nearly half of the respondents were moderately informed to well informed regarding the options of replacement of missing teeth. This highlights the need to increase awareness among the people regarding implant-related treatment options.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patients’ Awareness toward Implant-supported Prosthesis: An Observational Study

Raju

Gunupati

Babu

et al. 2017

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Implant-supported prosthesis has high predictability and success and improves quality of life. This study aims at assessing awareness among the patients regarding implantsupported prosthesis. Materials and methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted among 391 study participants. A structured questionnaire was distributed to assess implant-related awareness among the study participants. The questionnaires were analyzed for the responses.Results: Among the 391 respondents, 37.5% of the respondents reported having moderate knowledge regarding the tooth replacement options. Nearly 50% considered implants as a viable treatment option. The majority of them enlisted the dentist as the major source of information regarding implants, and media had a share of about 7.03% only. High cost was a major barrier in selecting implants as a treatment option. Conclusion:This survey showed that awareness among people was low regarding the dental implants. Efforts need to be directed to increase the awareness levels by utilizing media as a tool to achieve the target. Clinical significance:A patient who is aware of the advantages of the implant-supported dentures will make an informed decision for better functional stability and retention of the denture, especially in the mandibular arch.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patients’ Awareness toward Implant-supported Prosthesis: An Observational Study

Raju

Gunupati

Babu

et al. 2017

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…11,20,21 For this reason, Sailer et al 11 raised the possibility of screwed protheses becoming the most popular even if both methods had presented high survival rate, which makes it harder for us to define the best option. In addition, other studies 19,23,24,25 did not observe significant difference between retention methods when considering marginal bone resorption, as they are within normal standards, which reinforces the importance of complete subgingival removal of cement excesses to prevent peri-implantitis and marginal bone loss.…”

Section: Summary Of the Findingsmentioning

confidence: 57%

Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature

Relvas¹,

Fellows²,

Sotelo³

et al. 2018

CRORJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The discovery of titanium osseointegrated implants enabled the development of screw or cement-retained dental prostheses. However, each retention method involves different aspects. Objective: this study aims at reviewing the literature of in vitro and in vivo studies of the last 7 years on the mechanical, biological, aesthetic and occlusal properties and the cost of screw and cementretained prostheses to identify what can promote greater longevity and economy by considering the patient's clinical framework. Data sources: Our method was based on the collection of scientific articles published in English from 2012 to 2018 in the PubMed database. Summary of the findings: we noted that in some clinical cases, a retention method was more appropriate than the other, as seen in the access to the posterior region or the palatal face of the crowns, the position/ angulation of implants in the anterior region, the patient's health and economic conditions. Both protheses can suffer or not from mechanical and biological complications. Reversibility can also be associated to cement-retained protheses. There are alternatives to screwed prosthetics to achieve satisfactory aesthetics in the anterior region despite being more expensive. Ideal occlusion tends to be more easily achieved by cemented prosthesis as it avoids prosthetics screws and the formation of crown holes, despite the contributions of correct planning followed by the analysis of static and in motion occlusions. Conclusion: each retention method has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore,the best method is the one that best fits the characteristics and needs of each patient.

show abstract

“…The condition of peri-implantitis imposes worst complications by destroying the peri-implant tissue and bone loss concerned with both cement-retained and screwretained prosthesis. 5,6 Weber et al 7 compared the responses of peri-implant soft tissue between cement-retained and screw-retained restoration. Favorable results in terms of bleeding on probing and low plaque index were obtained for screw-retained restorations as compared to cementretained restorations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whereas, Al-Fahd et al 5 showed conflicting results concerning the implant reconstruction using a screw and cement-based restorations. Similarly, a systematic study of Sailer et al 8 showed that cement dental implant poses severe biological complications, which contradicts the results of de Brandao et al 9 which revealed no difference between the two types of implants.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions</p>

Hamed¹,

Mously²,

Alamoudi³

et al. 2020

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Dental implant is an effective and standardized treatment procedure in the healthcare setting. This study presents a comparison of dental implant reconstruction using screw and cement. It explicitly reviews the studies concerning cement and screws dental implants to determine the efficiency of the two. Patients and Methods: A systematic review was conducted by comprehensively searching electronic literature. The keywords, such as "Screw versus Cement Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions," "Screw Retained Fixed Implant." "Cement Implant" and "Dental Implant" were used for article searching. Twelve studies were included based on the determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: No significant difference was found between the screw-retained and cemented retained implant supported reconstructions. Dental implants are associated with complications leading to implant failure based on the type of restoration that is being used; cementretained restoration and screw-retained restoration. The treatment selection must be based on the significance criteria and the tooth condition. Conclusion: Screw-retained implant-supported reconstructions were found to pose less biological and technological complications. Retention of the tooth is more stable and functional when implantation is selected based on the efficiency of a treatment procedure.

show abstract

Impact of screw retained versus cement retained implant-supported prosthesis on peri-implantitis:A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 6 publications

References 16 publications

Patients’ Awareness toward Implant-supported Prosthesis: An Observational Study

Patients’ Awareness toward Implant-supported Prosthesis: An Observational Study

Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature

<p>A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions</p>

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About