2014
DOI: 10.1021/es502895v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Selective Catalytic Reduction on Exhaust Particle Formation over Excess Ammonia Events

Abstract: The introduction of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) aftertreatment to meet stringent diesel NOx emission standards around the world increases exhaust ammonia. Further to the direct air quality and health implications of ammonia, this may also lead to particle formation in the exhaust. In this study, an ammonia SCR system was examined with respect to its impact on both solid and total exhaust particle number and size distribution, downstream of a diesel particulate filter (DPF). Fuel post-injection was cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High concentrations of solid sub-23 nm particles have been measured with diesel engines without aftertreatment devices or low efficiency filters (Kittelson et al 2006;Heikkil€ a et al 2009), but with high efficiency filters they usually disappear (L€ ahde et al 2009). Particles can be formed by urea injection, and high sub-23 nm percentages can be measured (100%), but in absolute levels the concentration is low (Amanatidis et al 2014;Giechaskiel et al 2016).…”
Section: Sub-23 Nm Fraction Of Solid Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High concentrations of solid sub-23 nm particles have been measured with diesel engines without aftertreatment devices or low efficiency filters (Kittelson et al 2006;Heikkil€ a et al 2009), but with high efficiency filters they usually disappear (L€ ahde et al 2009). Particles can be formed by urea injection, and high sub-23 nm percentages can be measured (100%), but in absolute levels the concentration is low (Amanatidis et al 2014;Giechaskiel et al 2016).…”
Section: Sub-23 Nm Fraction Of Solid Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that in some studies it was recognized that the measured 'solid' nucleation mode was a (volatile) re-nucleation artefact downstream from the evaporation tube (Johnson et al 2009;Zheng et al 2011. Re-nucleation downstream from the evaporation tube has been shown when sulfur ) and/or ammonia is available (Amanatidis et al 2014). When the concentration of hydrocarbons is sufficient, these particles grow to sizes detectable with commonly used instruments (around 7-10 nm) (see, e.g., summary in and in some cases >23 nm (Zheng et al 2014;Giechaskiel et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported that urea injection in HD engine SCR systems leads to non-volatile particle formation [14,16,43]. These particles exhibit a mode that peaks below 20 nm and accordingly they are only partially detected by the regulated PN methodology which requires a 50% counting efficiency at 23 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact chemistry and formation mechanism of these particles is not well understood. It has been suggested that these are ammonium sulfates and bisulfates [15,16] or byproducts of the ammonium reduction process (i.e., ammelides, ammelines) [14]. These produced particles were found to be non-volatile (in the sense that they survive thermodilution at 350 • C) exhibiting a size distribution that peaks below 20 nm, i.e., below the regulatory limit of 23 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCR system is still the most widely used in many countries, due to its selectivity to reduce NO x emissions (Tadano et al, 2014). The injection of urea and a catalyst ensures reductions of up to 90% in NO x emissions, through a reduction reaction of NO x and NH 3 resulting in nitrogen and water (Amanatidis et al, 2014;Bacher et al, 2015). Nevertheless, SCR technology is not without its challenges, such as the emission of NH 3 , stoichiometric disproportion of urea consumption, cost, and deactivation of the catalyst by deposition (Cheruiyot et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%