2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of short-course radiotherapy and low anterior resection on quality of life and bowel function in primary rectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an earlier publication, we reported that radiotherapy has an independent negative influence on fecal incontinence in patients treated with low anterior resection. 19 A third patient in the present study had follow-up of …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier publication, we reported that radiotherapy has an independent negative influence on fecal incontinence in patients treated with low anterior resection. 19 A third patient in the present study had follow-up of …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 A small number of studies have not been bound by these limitations, using validated instruments to examine LARS more comprehensively, beyond fecal incontinence. [11][12][13][14][15] The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS score) is 1 such instrument. 16 It is a concise questionnaire designed for quick evaluation of a diverse range of LARS symptoms that patients find the most bothersome, and is suitable for routine use in clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since recommended adjuvant therapy [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] can not only decrease HRQL due to side effects [28,29] but also improve HRQL due to better expected health outcomes [30], adjuvant therapy must also be considered. The objective of this study is to investigate rectal cancer patients' postoperative HRQL based on a broad multidimensional interpretation of HRQL using the FACT-C in a prospective population-based cohort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%